MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7759/cureus.66403

Медицинская библиотека · Cureus · 2024

Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest With Bilateral Urinary Tract Injury Resulting From Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Case Report.

Tada Shuhei, Kikuta Shota, Matsuyama Shigenari, Ishihara Satoshi

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

A man in his 70s suffered cardiac arrest, and his family initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation after placing an emergency call. The initial waveform of the automated external defibrillator performed by emergency medical technicians revealed ventricular fibrillation. The patient received cardiovascular life support, including direct current countershock, and was transported to the hospital. Upon arrival, he underwent extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation using an automated chest compression device. Additionally, an intra-aortic balloon pumping was introduced after coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention. Plain computed tomography images revealed leakage of the contrast medium used during coronary angiography in the bilateral renal pelvis and perirenal area as well as bladder retention. Furthermore, a urine test revealed gross hematuria. There were no findings of prostatic hypertrophy or urinary tract disease. Based on the patient's clinical course, injury caused by chest compression was the most likely etiology of urinary tract injury, which must be considered in such patients. The patient was discharged with cerebral performance category 1, without any complication except urinary tract.

Для цитирования: Tada Shuhei, Kikuta Shota, Matsuyama Shigenari, Ishihara Satoshi. Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest With Bilateral Urinary Tract Injury Resulting From Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Case Report.. Cureus. 2024. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.66403.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.