European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2025
Somatic BRCA1/2 mutations are associated with a similar survival advantage to their germline counterparts in tubo-ovarian high grade serous carcinoma.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hollis Robert L, Churchman Michael, Grimes Graeme R, Meynert Alison M, Gautier Philippe, McMahon Lynn, Sherwood Kitty, Oswald Ailsa J, Croy Ian, Ferguson Michelle, Martin Cameron W, McGoldrick Trevor, McPhail Neil, Creedon Helen, Barrett J Carl, March Ruth, Dougherty Brian A, Roxburgh Patricia, Ewing Ailith, Herrington C Simon, Semple Colin A, Gourley Charlie
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Half of high grade serous tubo-ovarian carcinomas (HGSOC) demonstrate homologous recombination repair (HRR) deficiency, most commonly through germline or somatic pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 (gBRCA1/2 or sBRCA1/2). gBRCA1/2 is associated with favourable survival, greater response rate to platinum-based chemotherapy, and marked sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. sBRCA1/2 has been assumed to confer a similar clinical phenotype; however, few studies have specifically investigated sBRCA1/2 versus gBRCA1/2 to demonstrate their equivalence.
METHODS: We investigated the association of gBRCA1/2, sBRCA1/2 and non-BRCA HRR gene mutations with HGSOC patient survival using two patient cohorts (cohort 1, n = 174 matched FFPE tumour and normal with panel-based sequencing; cohort 2, n = 279 matched fresh tumour and normal with whole genome sequencing). TCGA-OV samples (n = 316) were used for external validation.
RESULTS: Patients with HRR-mutant tumours (BRCA1, BRCA2, non-BRCA HRR-mutant) demonstrated prolonged survival across both cohorts (cohort 1: multivariable hazard ratio [multiHR] 0.53 [0.32-0.87]; cohort 2: multiHR 0.36 [0.25-0.51]). gBRCA1/2 and sBRCA1/2 were associated with a similar survival benefit compared to the HRR-wildtype group in the combined cohort (cohort 1 +2) (gBRCA1/2: multiHR 0.50 [0.34-0.71]; sBRCA1/2: multiHR 0.41 [0.25-0.68]). These findings were recapitulated using the TCGA-OV dataset (gBRCA1/2: multiHR 0.56 [0.34-0.91]; sBRCA1/2: multiHR 0.48 [0.25-0.92]). Non-BRCA HRR mutations were associated with marked survival advantage (multiHR vs HRR-wildtype 0.22 [0.11-0.45]). The survival advantage in BRCA1-mutant cases (germline or somatic) was less marked (multiHR for non-BRCA HRR-mutant vs BRCA1-mutant 0.41 [0.19-0.90]). gBRCA1/2, sBRCA1/2 and non-BRCA HRR mutations were all associated with high HRDetect scores measuring HRR deficiency (median 1.00 versus 0.56 in HRR-wildtype, P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: gBRCA1/2 and sBRCA1/2 are equivalent in their association with prolonged survival. Non-BRCA HRR gene mutations may be associated with markedly favourable survival in HGSOC.
METHODS: We investigated the association of gBRCA1/2, sBRCA1/2 and non-BRCA HRR gene mutations with HGSOC patient survival using two patient cohorts (cohort 1, n = 174 matched FFPE tumour and normal with panel-based sequencing; cohort 2, n = 279 matched fresh tumour and normal with whole genome sequencing). TCGA-OV samples (n = 316) were used for external validation.
RESULTS: Patients with HRR-mutant tumours (BRCA1, BRCA2, non-BRCA HRR-mutant) demonstrated prolonged survival across both cohorts (cohort 1: multivariable hazard ratio [multiHR] 0.53 [0.32-0.87]; cohort 2: multiHR 0.36 [0.25-0.51]). gBRCA1/2 and sBRCA1/2 were associated with a similar survival benefit compared to the HRR-wildtype group in the combined cohort (cohort 1 +2) (gBRCA1/2: multiHR 0.50 [0.34-0.71]; sBRCA1/2: multiHR 0.41 [0.25-0.68]). These findings were recapitulated using the TCGA-OV dataset (gBRCA1/2: multiHR 0.56 [0.34-0.91]; sBRCA1/2: multiHR 0.48 [0.25-0.92]). Non-BRCA HRR mutations were associated with marked survival advantage (multiHR vs HRR-wildtype 0.22 [0.11-0.45]). The survival advantage in BRCA1-mutant cases (germline or somatic) was less marked (multiHR for non-BRCA HRR-mutant vs BRCA1-mutant 0.41 [0.19-0.90]). gBRCA1/2, sBRCA1/2 and non-BRCA HRR mutations were all associated with high HRDetect scores measuring HRR deficiency (median 1.00 versus 0.56 in HRR-wildtype, P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: gBRCA1/2 and sBRCA1/2 are equivalent in their association with prolonged survival. Non-BRCA HRR gene mutations may be associated with markedly favourable survival in HGSOC.