MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/ijc.20501

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of cancer · 2004

Supraglottic and glottic carcinomas: epidemiologically distinct entities?

De Stefani Eduardo, Boffetta Paolo, Deneo-Pellegrini Hugo, Brennan Paul, Correa Pelayo, Oreggia Fernando, Ronco Alvaro L, Mendilaharsu María

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

In the time period 1988-2000, a case-control study on laryngeal cancer was conducted in Montevideo, Uruguay. Four-hundred eighty-one (481) cases newly diagnosed and microscopically confirmed as squamous cell carcinomas were included. These cases were frequency matched with 481 nonneoplastic controls, admitted to the same hospitals as the cases. The purpose of our study was to compare odds ratios (ORs) by laryngeal subsite (supraglottis and glottis). ORs of supraglottic cancers displayed much higher risks than glottic carcinomas for most tobacco variables and for red wine intake. The differences between subsites were statistically significant, displaying heterogeneity between both subsites. Moreover, whereas black tobacco smokers displayed a significant increased risk of 1.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-2.5) compared to smokers of blond (flue-cured) tobacco among supraglottic tumors, no effect of this type of tobacco was observed in glottic lesions. It could be suggested that concerning tobacco and alcohol effects, supraglottic and glottic squamous cell cancers are probably distinct epidemiologic entities.

Для цитирования: De Stefani Eduardo, Boffetta Paolo, Deneo-Pellegrini Hugo, Brennan Paul, Correa Pelayo, Oreggia Fernando, Ronco Alvaro L, Mendilaharsu María. Supraglottic and glottic carcinomas: epidemiologically distinct entities?. International journal of cancer. 2004. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.20501.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.