Acta cytologica · 1996
The unicum and cytobrush plus spatula for cervical cytologic sampling: a comparison.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Broso P R, Buffetti G, Fabbrini T, Francone P, Orlassino R
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of the Unicum, a new ectocervical-endocervical nylon brush, with that of the Cytobrush plus wooden spatula in the collection of cervical-endocervical material.
STUDY DESIGN: Thirty-eight patients who underwent routine gynecologic examinations agreed to have a smear taken with the wooden spatula plus Cytobrush and the Unicum.
RESULTS: The two methods were equally effective in collecting endocervical-ectocervical smears.
CONCLUSION: With our method, sampling is done with only one device; the ectocervix and endocervix are sampled simultaneously, and adequate sampling of the transformation zone must be achieved.
STUDY DESIGN: Thirty-eight patients who underwent routine gynecologic examinations agreed to have a smear taken with the wooden spatula plus Cytobrush and the Unicum.
RESULTS: The two methods were equally effective in collecting endocervical-ectocervical smears.
CONCLUSION: With our method, sampling is done with only one device; the ectocervix and endocervix are sampled simultaneously, and adequate sampling of the transformation zone must be achieved.