MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s13018-026-06948-4

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026

Comparison of non-transport disc and conventional distraction osteogenesis for mandibular segmental defect reconstruction.

Lin Haiyun, Zhong Xiaoxia, Shen Huijuan, Zhou Nuo, Huang Xuanping

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

An animal model of non-transport disc distraction osteogenesis (NTDDO) was developed for repairing segmental mandibular defects in dogs. This study aimed to determine whether any difference exists in osteogenesis within the distraction zone between non-transport disc distraction osteogenesis (NTDDO) and conventional distraction osteogenesis (CDO), in order to provide a reference for its clinical application in the repair of segmental mandibular defects.

METHODS

Twenty-four dogs were divided into two groups, and animal models of NTDDO and CDO were established respectively.Samples were taken at 0, 2, 4,and 8 weeks of consolidation. The new bone in the distraction zone was observed or detected by gross condition, X-ray film, Micro CT, biomechanical test. The histological manifestation of new bone was observed by HE staining. The expression of the osteoblast marker Runx2, and the endothelial cell marker CD31 were detected by immunohistochemistry and microvessel density was calculated.

RESULTS

The results from gross specimens, radiographs, and HE staining indicated no significant differences in new bone formation within the distraction gap between the NTDDO and CDO groups at any time point. Micro-CT analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in BMD, BV/TV, Tb.Th, Tb.N, or Tb.Sp (P > 0.05). Similarly, biomechanical testing showed no significant difference in maximum load (P > 0.05). Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated comparable expression levels of CD31 and Runx2, with no significant difference in neovascular density (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-transport disc distraction osteogenesis achieves osteogenic quality equivalent to conventional distraction osteogenesis, with inferior alveolar neurovascular resection posing no adverse effects on bone regeneration. The underlying mechanisms, particularly the potential interplay between nerve regeneration and periosteal contributions, warrant further exploration.

Для цитирования: Lin Haiyun, Zhong Xiaoxia, Shen Huijuan, Zhou Nuo, Huang Xuanping. Comparison of non-transport disc and conventional distraction osteogenesis for mandibular segmental defect reconstruction.. Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research. 2026. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-026-06948-4.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.