International journal of dentistry · 2026
Comparative Evaluation of Buccal Cortical Bone Thickness in the Posterior Mandible Across Skeletal Patterns: A CBCT Study in a Sample of Iranians.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ranji Paniz, Dalaei Kazem, Mansouri Melika, Safi Yaser, Amiri Maede Jafarian, Hosseinzadeh Mehdi
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate buccal cortical bone thickness in the posterior mandible across different sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, cortical buccal bone thickness between posterior teeth was assessed at 4 and 7 mm distances from the alveolar crest using CBCT images of 112 Iranian participants aged 18-60 years. Participants were classified into six groups: Class I normal angle, Class I low angle, Class I high angle, Class II normal angle, Class II low angle, and Class II high angle. Statistical analyses included the Shapiro-Wilk test, Levene's test, multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), paired-sample t-test, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), with a significance level set at α = 0.05.
RESULTS: Cortical bone thickness generally increased from anterior to posterior regions and from the alveolar crest toward the basal jaw in Class II and both high- and low-angle groups, with exceptions observed in Class I and normal-angle individuals. Statistically significant differences in cortical bone thickness were observed between Class I and Class II skeletal patterns at specific posterior sites, with Class I individuals consistently exhibiting greater thickness. Differences related to vertical skeletal pattern were limited, observed only at the distal canine (4-mm level). Sex, age, and side-to-side differences influenced cortical thickness in certain regions, with slightly greater thickness on the left side at some measurement sites.
CONCLUSIONS: Buccal cortical bone thickness in the posterior mandible varies significantly with the sagittal skeletal pattern, whereas the vertical skeletal pattern has minimal influence.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, cortical buccal bone thickness between posterior teeth was assessed at 4 and 7 mm distances from the alveolar crest using CBCT images of 112 Iranian participants aged 18-60 years. Participants were classified into six groups: Class I normal angle, Class I low angle, Class I high angle, Class II normal angle, Class II low angle, and Class II high angle. Statistical analyses included the Shapiro-Wilk test, Levene's test, multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), paired-sample t-test, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), with a significance level set at α = 0.05.
RESULTS: Cortical bone thickness generally increased from anterior to posterior regions and from the alveolar crest toward the basal jaw in Class II and both high- and low-angle groups, with exceptions observed in Class I and normal-angle individuals. Statistically significant differences in cortical bone thickness were observed between Class I and Class II skeletal patterns at specific posterior sites, with Class I individuals consistently exhibiting greater thickness. Differences related to vertical skeletal pattern were limited, observed only at the distal canine (4-mm level). Sex, age, and side-to-side differences influenced cortical thickness in certain regions, with slightly greater thickness on the left side at some measurement sites.
CONCLUSIONS: Buccal cortical bone thickness in the posterior mandible varies significantly with the sagittal skeletal pattern, whereas the vertical skeletal pattern has minimal influence.