Acta neurochirurgica · 2022
Comparison of the electrophysiological characteristics of tight filum terminale and tethered cord syndrome.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kamei Naosuke, Nakamae Toshio, Nakanishi Kazuyoshi, Morisako Taiki, Harada Takahiro, Maruyama Toshiaki, Adachi Nobuo
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study aims to characterize tight filum terminale (TFT) in motor evoked potential (MEP) testing by comparing TFT patients with both tethered cord syndrome (TCS) patients and healthy subjects.
METHODS: Fifty TFT patients, 18 TCS patients, and 35 healthy volunteers participated in this study. We recorded MEPs following transcranial magnetic stimulation from the bilateral abductor hallucis muscles as well as compound muscle action potentials and F-waves evoked by electrical stimulation of the tibial nerve from the bilateral abductor pollicis brevis muscles. The peripheral conduction time (PCT) was calculated from the latency of the compound action potential and F-wave. Furthermore, the central motor conduction time (CMCT) was calculated by subtracting PCT from MEP latency.
RESULTS: TFT and TCS patients had a significantly longer MEP latency than healthy subjects. PCT in TFT patients was significantly longer than those in TCS patients or healthy subjects. Using the cutoff values for PCT, we were able to diagnose patients with TFT patients with a sensitivity of 72.0% and a specificity of 91.4%.
CONCLUSION: Prolonged PCT in the MEP test may be a useful indicator for TFT and suggests that MEP may be used as an adjunct diagnostic tool for TFT.
METHODS: Fifty TFT patients, 18 TCS patients, and 35 healthy volunteers participated in this study. We recorded MEPs following transcranial magnetic stimulation from the bilateral abductor hallucis muscles as well as compound muscle action potentials and F-waves evoked by electrical stimulation of the tibial nerve from the bilateral abductor pollicis brevis muscles. The peripheral conduction time (PCT) was calculated from the latency of the compound action potential and F-wave. Furthermore, the central motor conduction time (CMCT) was calculated by subtracting PCT from MEP latency.
RESULTS: TFT and TCS patients had a significantly longer MEP latency than healthy subjects. PCT in TFT patients was significantly longer than those in TCS patients or healthy subjects. Using the cutoff values for PCT, we were able to diagnose patients with TFT patients with a sensitivity of 72.0% and a specificity of 91.4%.
CONCLUSION: Prolonged PCT in the MEP test may be a useful indicator for TFT and suggests that MEP may be used as an adjunct diagnostic tool for TFT.