Journal of computer assisted tomography · 2022
Cauda Equina Atrophy in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis on Routine Lumbar Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Matsushima Satoshi, Omoto Shusaku, Shimizu Tetsuya, Baba Akira, Ojiri Hiroya
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the cross-sectional area of the cauda equina in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) on routine lumbar magnetic resonance imaging and investigate the diagnostic accuracy in comparison with age- and sex-matched non-ALS controls.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 15 ALS patients and 15 age- and sex-matched non-ALS controls. Two independent neuroradiologists measured and compared the total cross-sectional area of the cauda equina of ALS patients and the non-ALS controls at the level of the L3 and L4 using axial T2-weighted images. The cutoff value, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve were measured. The interobserver reproducibility of the 2 independently obtained measurements was evaluated.
RESULTS: The total cross-sectional area of the cauda equina in the ALS group was significantly smaller than that in the non-ALS group (L3: median, 66.73 vs 90.19 mm 2 , P < 0.001; L4: median, 52.9 vs 67.63 mm 2 , P < 0.001). The cutoff values at L3 and L4 were 76.95 and 61.04 mm 2 with a sensitivity and specificity of 1 and 0.87 and 0.8 and 0.87, respectively. The area under the curve at L3 and L4 were high at 0.96 and 0.94, respectively. The interobserver reproducibility was 0.88 at L3 and 0.89 at L4.
CONCLUSIONS: The ALS patients showed significant atrophy of the cauda equina compared with non-ALS patients.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 15 ALS patients and 15 age- and sex-matched non-ALS controls. Two independent neuroradiologists measured and compared the total cross-sectional area of the cauda equina of ALS patients and the non-ALS controls at the level of the L3 and L4 using axial T2-weighted images. The cutoff value, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve were measured. The interobserver reproducibility of the 2 independently obtained measurements was evaluated.
RESULTS: The total cross-sectional area of the cauda equina in the ALS group was significantly smaller than that in the non-ALS group (L3: median, 66.73 vs 90.19 mm 2 , P < 0.001; L4: median, 52.9 vs 67.63 mm 2 , P < 0.001). The cutoff values at L3 and L4 were 76.95 and 61.04 mm 2 with a sensitivity and specificity of 1 and 0.87 and 0.8 and 0.87, respectively. The area under the curve at L3 and L4 were high at 0.96 and 0.94, respectively. The interobserver reproducibility was 0.88 at L3 and 0.89 at L4.
CONCLUSIONS: The ALS patients showed significant atrophy of the cauda equina compared with non-ALS patients.