MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s12185-024-03781-5

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of hematology · 2024

New classifications of B-cell neoplasms: a comparison of 5th WHO and International Consensus classifications.

Karube Kennosuke, Satou Akira, Kato Seiichi

СтатьяОбзорСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

In 2024, the World Health Organization (WHO) launched a new classification of lymphoid neoplasms, a revision of the previously used Revised 4th Edition of their classification (WHO-4R). However, this means that two classifications are now in simultaneous use: the 5th Edition of the WHO classification (WHO-5) and the International Consensus Classification (ICC). Instead of a comprehensive review of each disease entity, as already described elsewhere, this review focuses on revisions made in both the WHO-5 and ICC from WHO-4R and discrepancies between them regarding B-cell neoplasms. Similarities include cutaneous marginal zone lymphoma, cold agglutinin disease, non-primary effusion lymphoma-type effusion-based lymphoma, and gray zone lymphoma. Differences include plasma cell neoplasms, high-grade B-cell lymphoma (double hit lymphoma), follicular lymphoma, LPD with immune deficiency and dysregulation, extranodal large B-cell lymphoma, transformations of indolent B-cell lymphomas, and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified. Understanding the similarities and differences between the two latest classifications will aid daily diagnostic practice and future research on lymphoid neoplasms.

Для цитирования: Karube Kennosuke, Satou Akira, Kato Seiichi. New classifications of B-cell neoplasms: a comparison of 5th WHO and International Consensus classifications.. International journal of hematology. 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s12185-024-03781-5.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.