MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/micr.30073

Медицинская библиотека · Microsurgery · 2016

Free prepuce perforator flap: Ultra-thin superficial penile artery perforator flap for a dorsal finger defect.

Yamamoto Takumi, Yoshimatsu Hidehiko, Kikuchi Kazuki

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Dorsal skin defect of the hand/digit requires thin and pliable skin for coverage. The prepuce skin, the second thinnest skin, can be a reconstructive option, but there is no previous report of a free prepuce flap for the reconstruction of the hand/digit. We report the first successful case of a free prepuce flap based on the superficial penile artery perforator (SPAP) for the treatment of dorsal soft tissue defect of the hand/digit. A 68-year-old male presented with a 5 x 3 cm dorsal soft tissue defect of the left index finger with the extensor tendon exposure. A prepuce perforator flap was raised based on the SPAP. The flap was transferred to the recipient site, and the SPAP was supermicrosurgically anastomosed to the dorsal branch of the digital artery. The patient complained no postoperative discomfort of the donor penis, and was satisfied with functionally pleasing and esthetically acceptable results of the reconstructed finger and the donor site. Although only applicable for male patients without past history of penile trauma such as circumcision, a prepuce perforator flap may be an option for thin and pliable skin reconstruction with minimal donor site morbidity. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 37:252-255, 2017.

Для цитирования: Yamamoto Takumi, Yoshimatsu Hidehiko, Kikuchi Kazuki. Free prepuce perforator flap: Ultra-thin superficial penile artery perforator flap for a dorsal finger defect.. Microsurgery. 2016. DOI: 10.1002/micr.30073.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.