Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina) · 2022
Double heterozygous mutation in RAD50 and ATM genes in a Peruvian family with five cancer types: a case report.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sánchez Castro Enrique Eduardo, Ziegler-Rodriguez Gonzalo, Castro Mujica María Del Carmen
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Cancer is the second leading cause of death worldwide, with 70% of cancer deaths occurring in low- or middle- income countries. To mitigate the mortality of this disease, it is recommended the evaluation of multiple high-penetrance genes.
METHODS: We used a multi-gene panel testing to identify germline variants in a unique case of a breast cancer patient with a family history of five different neoplasm types. The patient, at the age of 50 years, was diagnosed with a high-grade cribriform ductal carcinoma in situ in her left breast.
RESULTS: We identified two heterozygous mutations, one classified as pathogenic/likely pathogenic in RAD50 and the other classified as a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) in ATM.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the use of the multi-gene panel leads to the identification of a double heterozygous mutation in RAD50 and ATM in a breast cancer patient from a Peruvian family with several cancer types. This data helps our physician team and the patient to choose a treatment following the post-test genetic counseling.
METHODS: We used a multi-gene panel testing to identify germline variants in a unique case of a breast cancer patient with a family history of five different neoplasm types. The patient, at the age of 50 years, was diagnosed with a high-grade cribriform ductal carcinoma in situ in her left breast.
RESULTS: We identified two heterozygous mutations, one classified as pathogenic/likely pathogenic in RAD50 and the other classified as a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) in ATM.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the use of the multi-gene panel leads to the identification of a double heterozygous mutation in RAD50 and ATM in a breast cancer patient from a Peruvian family with several cancer types. This data helps our physician team and the patient to choose a treatment following the post-test genetic counseling.