International journal of emergency medicine · 2025
A periscope-based, 3D printed indirect laryngoscope for resource limited settings: a non-randomized observational manikin trial.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Schmitt Phillip R, Maguire Samantha, Sternlicht Eliza, Quinn Austin M, Fisher Whit, Beck Andrew
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: In the United States and other resource-rich settings, video laryngoscopy is often favored for emergency intubation over direct laryngoscopy due to ease of use and improved performance in difficult airways. Video laryngoscopes pose a significant cost barrier against adoption in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In this study, we designed and tested a low-cost, 3D printable, periscope-based laryngoscope that achieves an indirect view of the vocal cords without the use of a video camera. The absence of expensive video components allows this device to be manufactured for $4.41 USD, making it well-suited for resource-limited settings.
METHODS: The periscope-based laryngoscope was manufactured from polylactic acid (PLA) filament using a 3D printer. Manikin testing of the laryngoscope was performed by providers ranging from medical students to experienced physicians using the high fidelity Laerdal SimMan®. The novel laryngoscope was compared to commonly available direct and video laryngoscopes, and intubation times and first-pass success rates were recorded.
RESULTS: A total of 121 trials were performed. In experienced intubators, faster intubation times were seen in the direct and periscope-based laryngoscopes compared to video laryngoscopes. Mean intubation times for experienced intubators were as follows: Direct Laryngoscope = 17.45 s, Video Laryngoscope = 23.34 s, and Novel Periscope-based Laryngoscope = 11.31 s, with statistical significance (p < 0.001) found between the Video and Periscope-based laryngoscope times. 100% of trials resulted in successful intubation of the trachea.
CONCLUSION: The periscope-based laryngoscope yielded intubation times and first-pass success rates that compare favorably to direct and video laryngoscopes, and it can be readily manufactured in multiple environments at a low price point without proprietary industrial technology. Next steps include human clinical trials and regulatory approvals prior to clinical adoption of the novel device.
METHODS: The periscope-based laryngoscope was manufactured from polylactic acid (PLA) filament using a 3D printer. Manikin testing of the laryngoscope was performed by providers ranging from medical students to experienced physicians using the high fidelity Laerdal SimMan®. The novel laryngoscope was compared to commonly available direct and video laryngoscopes, and intubation times and first-pass success rates were recorded.
RESULTS: A total of 121 trials were performed. In experienced intubators, faster intubation times were seen in the direct and periscope-based laryngoscopes compared to video laryngoscopes. Mean intubation times for experienced intubators were as follows: Direct Laryngoscope = 17.45 s, Video Laryngoscope = 23.34 s, and Novel Periscope-based Laryngoscope = 11.31 s, with statistical significance (p < 0.001) found between the Video and Periscope-based laryngoscope times. 100% of trials resulted in successful intubation of the trachea.
CONCLUSION: The periscope-based laryngoscope yielded intubation times and first-pass success rates that compare favorably to direct and video laryngoscopes, and it can be readily manufactured in multiple environments at a low price point without proprietary industrial technology. Next steps include human clinical trials and regulatory approvals prior to clinical adoption of the novel device.