Lancet (London, England) · 2026
[177Lu]Lu-edotreotide versus everolimus for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (COMPETE): a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, open-label, superiority trial.
СтатьяКлиническое исследование III фазыМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеEquivalence TrialНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Walter Thomas, Jann Henning, Ansquer Catherine, Deshayes Emmanuel, Garcia-Carbonero Rocio, Teulé Alexandre, Baum Richard P, Verberne Hein J, Ćwikła Jarosław B, Srirajaskanthan Rajaventhan, de Mestier Louis, Grana Chiara M, Buck Andreas, Hörsch Dieter, Pavel Marianne, Dierickx Lawrence O, Michael Michael, Strosberg Jonathan, Kollár Attila, Jimenez-Fonseca Paula, Rinke Anja, Del Olmo-García Maribel, Flaus Anthime, Hernando Jorge, Kluge Andreas, Breuninger Monika, Melnyk Serhii, Zhernosekov Konstantin, Capdevila Jaume, COMPETE Investigator Team
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Peptide receptor radionuclide and targeted therapy are both approved treatment options for patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP NETs), but clinical evidence for preferred sequencing is scarce. The COMPETE trial evaluated the efficacy and harms of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy ([177Lu]Lu-edotreotide) versus targeted molecular therapy (everolimus) in patients with advanced, progressive, somatostatin receptor-positive GEP NETs.
METHODS: This phase 3, open-label, superiority trial included patients aged 18 years or older with treatment-naive or previously treated unresectable or metastatic (or both) grade 1-2 GEP NETs. Patients were enrolled from 49 specialist neuroendocrine tumour treatment centres across 14 countries in Africa, Europe, North America, and Oceania and randomised (2:1) to intravenous [177Lu]Lu-edotreotide (7·5 ± 0·7 GBq every 3 months, maximum four cycles) or oral everolimus (10 mg/day) for up to 30 months. Random assignment was via a central, web-based randomisation system (block size of 6) and stratified by primary tumour origin and previous therapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, assessed via blinded independent central review in all randomly assigned patients at 30 months. Harms were assessed in all enrolled patients who received at least one dose of a study drug. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03049189) and is no longer recruiting.
FINDINGS: Between April 13, 2017, and June 20, 2022, 324 patients were enrolled and 309 patients (including 168 [54%] male patients and 141 [46%] female patients) were randomly assigned to treatment: 207 to the [177Lu]Lu-edotreotide group and 102 to the everolimus group. The median follow-up for progression-free survival was 27·5 months (IQR 19·6-30·4) for the [177Lu]Lu-edotreotide group and 21·2 months (8·9-29·4) for the everolimus group. Median progression-free survival was significantly longer with [177Lu]Lu-edotreotide versus everolimus (23·9 months [95% CI 18·7-30·0] vs 14·1 months [9·2-20·9]; stratified hazard ratio 0·67 [95% CI 0·48-0·95]; p=0·022). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 178 (82%) of 217 patients in the [177Lu]Lu-edotreotide group and 96 (97%) of 99 patients in the everolimus group. 40 (18%) patients in the [177Lu]Lu-edotreotide group and 40 (40%) in the everolimus group had at least one treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse event. The most common treatment-related adverse events in the [177Lu]Lu-edotreotide group were diarrhoea and nausea (both 79 [36%] patients) and asthenia (66 [33%] patients), whereas those in the everolimus group were diarrhoea (45 [45%] patients), asthenia (36 [36%] patients), and anaemia (27 [27%] patients). No treatment-related deaths occurred in either study group.
INTERPRETATION: [177Lu]Lu-edotreotide led to statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in progression-free survival. Efficacy and harms results support the use of [177Lu]Lu-edotreotide in early lines of therapy in patients with advanced, progressive GEP NETs.
FUNDING: ITM Solucin.
METHODS: This phase 3, open-label, superiority trial included patients aged 18 years or older with treatment-naive or previously treated unresectable or metastatic (or both) grade 1-2 GEP NETs. Patients were enrolled from 49 specialist neuroendocrine tumour treatment centres across 14 countries in Africa, Europe, North America, and Oceania and randomised (2:1) to intravenous [177Lu]Lu-edotreotide (7·5 ± 0·7 GBq every 3 months, maximum four cycles) or oral everolimus (10 mg/day) for up to 30 months. Random assignment was via a central, web-based randomisation system (block size of 6) and stratified by primary tumour origin and previous therapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, assessed via blinded independent central review in all randomly assigned patients at 30 months. Harms were assessed in all enrolled patients who received at least one dose of a study drug. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03049189) and is no longer recruiting.
FINDINGS: Between April 13, 2017, and June 20, 2022, 324 patients were enrolled and 309 patients (including 168 [54%] male patients and 141 [46%] female patients) were randomly assigned to treatment: 207 to the [177Lu]Lu-edotreotide group and 102 to the everolimus group. The median follow-up for progression-free survival was 27·5 months (IQR 19·6-30·4) for the [177Lu]Lu-edotreotide group and 21·2 months (8·9-29·4) for the everolimus group. Median progression-free survival was significantly longer with [177Lu]Lu-edotreotide versus everolimus (23·9 months [95% CI 18·7-30·0] vs 14·1 months [9·2-20·9]; stratified hazard ratio 0·67 [95% CI 0·48-0·95]; p=0·022). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 178 (82%) of 217 patients in the [177Lu]Lu-edotreotide group and 96 (97%) of 99 patients in the everolimus group. 40 (18%) patients in the [177Lu]Lu-edotreotide group and 40 (40%) in the everolimus group had at least one treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse event. The most common treatment-related adverse events in the [177Lu]Lu-edotreotide group were diarrhoea and nausea (both 79 [36%] patients) and asthenia (66 [33%] patients), whereas those in the everolimus group were diarrhoea (45 [45%] patients), asthenia (36 [36%] patients), and anaemia (27 [27%] patients). No treatment-related deaths occurred in either study group.
INTERPRETATION: [177Lu]Lu-edotreotide led to statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in progression-free survival. Efficacy and harms results support the use of [177Lu]Lu-edotreotide in early lines of therapy in patients with advanced, progressive GEP NETs.
FUNDING: ITM Solucin.