MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/jjco/28.4.267

Медицинская библиотека · Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 1998

Splenic irradiation for prolymphocytic leukemia: is it preferable as an initial treatment or not?

Yamamoto K, Hamaguchi H, Nagata K, Shibuya H, Takeuchi H

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We describe a case of B-cell prolymphocytic leukemia (PLL) successfully treated with splenic irradiation (SI). A 69-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital because of massive splenomegaly and leukocytosis. Peripheral blood showed hemoglobin (Hb) 7.4 g/dl, platelets 48 x 10(9)/l and white blood cells (WBC) 50.3 x 10(9)/l with 90% prolymphocytes. Bone marrow was hypercellular with 60% prolymphocytes. Surface marker analysis revealed that prolymphocytes were positive for CD20, CD22, FMC7, HLA-DR and surface immunoglobulin (mu, delta and lambda), but negative for CD5 and mouse erythrocyte rosette. A diagnosis of B-cell PLL was made. SI (1.5 Gy x 4/week, total dose 19.5 Gy) was chosen for the treatment and a remarkable response was achieved immediately after the first irradiation. Finally, a single course of SI induced complete remission without any significant side effect. One year after the SI, she showed no splenomegaly and almost normal peripheral blood cell count (Hb 11.2 g/dl, platelets 100 x 10(9)/l, WBC 3.6 x 10(9)/l with 71% neutrophils and no prolymphocyte). She has been well for more than 24 months. This case showed that SI may remain valuable for an initial course of PLL treatment.

Для цитирования: Yamamoto K, Hamaguchi H, Nagata K, Shibuya H, Takeuchi H. Splenic irradiation for prolymphocytic leukemia: is it preferable as an initial treatment or not?. Japanese journal of clinical oncology. 1998. DOI: 10.1093/jjco/28.4.267.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.