The British journal of surgery · 2025
Peritonectomy to enhance adequate cytoreductive surgery in peritoneal surface malignancy: review of nomenclature and boundaries.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bhatt Aditi, Fotopoulou Christina, Moran Brendan J, Chi Dennis, Stepanyan Artem, Baumgartner Joel M, Bakrin Naoual, Deraco Marcello, Ferron Gwenael, Kepenekian Vahan, Kusamura Shigeki, Lavoue Vincent, Al Niami Ahmed, Arjona-Sanchez Alvaro, Sehouli Jalid, Sukumar Vivek, Turaga Kiran, Villeneuve Laurent, Planchamp François, Brennan Donal J, Gutiérrez Ignacio Z, Glehen Olivier
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery is increasingly performed worldwide for a variety of primary and secondary peritoneal surface malignancies. Significant heterogeneity exists regarding the extent of peritonectomy performed in each abdominal region and the terminology used to describe the surgical procedure. The aims of this review were to summarize the literature and identify gaps where consensus is needed.
METHODS: MEDLINE was systematically searched using the keywords 'cytoreductive surgery', 'technique', and 'peritonectomy'. Relevant articles in English published from 1 January 1985 to 1 November 2023 were reviewed manually. Commentaries and letters were included if they had a description of the technique or boundaries. Book chapters and books on the topic were searched and reviewed.
RESULTS: In total, 46 manuscripts and 13 book chapters were included. Over half of the manuscripts (26 of 46 (56.5%)) and 61.5% (8 of 13) of the book chapters described some of the boundaries. None had a complete description of all the boundaries. Few publications described the subdivisions of peritonectomy procedures. There was heterogeneity in the terms used for the same peritonectomy procedure and, when a particular term was used, the extent of peritonectomy that was performed varied.
CONCLUSION: Heterogeneity in nomenclature and procedures performed underscores the need for a consensus, which should lead to uniformity in documentation of the extent of peritoneal resection performed.
METHODS: MEDLINE was systematically searched using the keywords 'cytoreductive surgery', 'technique', and 'peritonectomy'. Relevant articles in English published from 1 January 1985 to 1 November 2023 were reviewed manually. Commentaries and letters were included if they had a description of the technique or boundaries. Book chapters and books on the topic were searched and reviewed.
RESULTS: In total, 46 manuscripts and 13 book chapters were included. Over half of the manuscripts (26 of 46 (56.5%)) and 61.5% (8 of 13) of the book chapters described some of the boundaries. None had a complete description of all the boundaries. Few publications described the subdivisions of peritonectomy procedures. There was heterogeneity in the terms used for the same peritonectomy procedure and, when a particular term was used, the extent of peritonectomy that was performed varied.
CONCLUSION: Heterogeneity in nomenclature and procedures performed underscores the need for a consensus, which should lead to uniformity in documentation of the extent of peritoneal resection performed.