BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024
Is expectant management feasible for select patients diagnosed with a heterotopic tubal pregnancy following in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection?
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mao Yuyao, Peng Yangqin, Zheng Mingxiang, Cai Pei, Gong Fei, Chen Hui, Lin Ge, Ouyang Yan, Li Xihong
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Heterotopic pregnancy (HP) is a rare type of pathological pregnancy, and the most common site of concomitant ectopic pregnancy (EP) is the fallopian tube. Some studies have shown that expectant treatment could be considered because some EPs tend to regress spontaneously. However, data on the expectant treatment of HP are lacking. This study aimed to examine the outcomes of eutopic pregnancies following expectant management of concomitant tubal EP after in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).
METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational matched cohort study. All patients who conceived with tubal HP (HTP) via IVF/ICSI and were treated expectantly between January 2010 and December 2021 were enrolled. Each HTP patient managed expectantly (A) was randomly matched with one control patient who conceived with a solely eutopic pregnancy (B) and one HTP patient who underwent surgical therapy (C) from our clinical database according to predefined criteria. The expectant group and the control groups were matched for maternal age (MA; ±1 year), gravidity (0; ≥1) and gestational age (GA) at presentation (± 2 days). The pregnancy outcomes of the study group and the control groups were compared.
RESULTS: More than three-quarters of the EPs in patients treated expectantly were inhomogeneous solid masses (n = 95, 76.6%), and an empty gestational sac was the second most common (n = 18, 14.5%). The rates of live birth (76.6%, 79.0%, 73.4%; P = 0.647 (A versus B); P = 0.557 (A versus C)) and early miscarriage (21.8%, 19.4%, 25.8%; P = 0.637 (A versus B); P = 0.456 (A versus C)) in the expectant group were similar to those in the eutopic group and those in the surgical group. There were no significant differences in of the preterm birth rate (7.3%, 7.3%, 7.3%; P = 1.000 (A versus B); P = 1.000 (A versus C)), perinatal mortality (1.0%, 1.0%, 1.1%; P = 1.000 (A versus B); P = 1.000 (A versus C)), GA at delivery (38.7 ± 2.1, 38.4 ± 2.4, 38.5 ± 2.3 weeks; P = 0.286 (A versus B); P = 0.425 (A versus C)) or birth weight (3294.8 ± 507.2, 3238.2 ± 646.1, 3194.5 ± 452.9 g; P = 0.498 (A versus B); P = 0.157 (A versus C)).
CONCLUSION: Expectant management was an option for select women with HTP. The prognoses of the concomitant eutopic pregnancies were comparable to those of the solely eutopic singleton pregnancies and the HTPs managed surgically. The application of this protocol in clinical practice significantly reduces the need for surgical or medical treatment of EP. Notably, close follow-up is required, and patients need to be vigilant and have immediate access to medical resources in case of an emergency.
METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational matched cohort study. All patients who conceived with tubal HP (HTP) via IVF/ICSI and were treated expectantly between January 2010 and December 2021 were enrolled. Each HTP patient managed expectantly (A) was randomly matched with one control patient who conceived with a solely eutopic pregnancy (B) and one HTP patient who underwent surgical therapy (C) from our clinical database according to predefined criteria. The expectant group and the control groups were matched for maternal age (MA; ±1 year), gravidity (0; ≥1) and gestational age (GA) at presentation (± 2 days). The pregnancy outcomes of the study group and the control groups were compared.
RESULTS: More than three-quarters of the EPs in patients treated expectantly were inhomogeneous solid masses (n = 95, 76.6%), and an empty gestational sac was the second most common (n = 18, 14.5%). The rates of live birth (76.6%, 79.0%, 73.4%; P = 0.647 (A versus B); P = 0.557 (A versus C)) and early miscarriage (21.8%, 19.4%, 25.8%; P = 0.637 (A versus B); P = 0.456 (A versus C)) in the expectant group were similar to those in the eutopic group and those in the surgical group. There were no significant differences in of the preterm birth rate (7.3%, 7.3%, 7.3%; P = 1.000 (A versus B); P = 1.000 (A versus C)), perinatal mortality (1.0%, 1.0%, 1.1%; P = 1.000 (A versus B); P = 1.000 (A versus C)), GA at delivery (38.7 ± 2.1, 38.4 ± 2.4, 38.5 ± 2.3 weeks; P = 0.286 (A versus B); P = 0.425 (A versus C)) or birth weight (3294.8 ± 507.2, 3238.2 ± 646.1, 3194.5 ± 452.9 g; P = 0.498 (A versus B); P = 0.157 (A versus C)).
CONCLUSION: Expectant management was an option for select women with HTP. The prognoses of the concomitant eutopic pregnancies were comparable to those of the solely eutopic singleton pregnancies and the HTPs managed surgically. The application of this protocol in clinical practice significantly reduces the need for surgical or medical treatment of EP. Notably, close follow-up is required, and patients need to be vigilant and have immediate access to medical resources in case of an emergency.