Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2013
Adrenomedullin in peritoneal effluent expressed by peritoneal mesothelial cells.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kono Rika, Kanozawa Koichi, Shimosawa Tatsuo, Tayama Yousuke, Matsuda Akihiko, Hasegawa Hajime, Mitarai Tetsuya
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Adrenomedullin (AM) possesses vasodilative and cell-protective properties. Glycine combines with the C-terminal of AM to form mature, physiologically active AM (mAM). AM is reportedly induced by high glucose condition in vascular endothelial or smooth muscle cells; however, little is known on how AM is activated by amidation. To investigate the behavior of AM in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD), the concentrations of AM, mAM and CA125 were measured. The mAM to AM ratio (mAM/AM ratio) was also evaluated as a marker of amidation activity.
METHODS: Twenty patients were recruited for this study. The effluent at the time of the peritoneal equilibration test was collected and AM, mAM and CA125 concentrations were measured. The expression of AM in peritoneal mesothelial cells (PMCs) collected from effluent was also examined with an indirect immunofluorescent method.
RESULTS: Mean values of AM and mAM in effluent were 18.1 ± 1.6 and 4.1 ± 0.3 fmol/mL, respectively. In plasma, they were 42.6 ± 3.3 and 5.6 ± 0.6 fmol/mL, respectively. AM concentrations in effluent did not correlate with plasma AM level but correlated well with the dialysate-to-plasma ratio of creatinine (D/P ratio of creatinine). Moreover, in 7 of 20 cases, concentrations of the mAM and mAM/AM ratio in effluent were higher than in plasma. In effluent, AM concentration but not the mAM/AM ratio correlated with CA125 concentration. Immunocytological study revealed diffuse, cytoplasmic expression of AM in PMCs which were collected from effluent during PD.
CONCLUSION: AM is expressed by PMCs and actively amidated in the abdominal cavity of patients undergoing PD.
METHODS: Twenty patients were recruited for this study. The effluent at the time of the peritoneal equilibration test was collected and AM, mAM and CA125 concentrations were measured. The expression of AM in peritoneal mesothelial cells (PMCs) collected from effluent was also examined with an indirect immunofluorescent method.
RESULTS: Mean values of AM and mAM in effluent were 18.1 ± 1.6 and 4.1 ± 0.3 fmol/mL, respectively. In plasma, they were 42.6 ± 3.3 and 5.6 ± 0.6 fmol/mL, respectively. AM concentrations in effluent did not correlate with plasma AM level but correlated well with the dialysate-to-plasma ratio of creatinine (D/P ratio of creatinine). Moreover, in 7 of 20 cases, concentrations of the mAM and mAM/AM ratio in effluent were higher than in plasma. In effluent, AM concentration but not the mAM/AM ratio correlated with CA125 concentration. Immunocytological study revealed diffuse, cytoplasmic expression of AM in PMCs which were collected from effluent during PD.
CONCLUSION: AM is expressed by PMCs and actively amidated in the abdominal cavity of patients undergoing PD.