MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2006.06430.x

Медицинская библиотека · BJU international · 2006

The use of robotically assisted surgery for treating urachal anomalies.

Madeb Ralph, Knopf Joy K, Nicholson Craig, Donahue Laurence A, Adcock Brian, Dever David, Tan Beng Jit, Valvo John R, Eichel Louis

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To report the management of urachal anomalies using a robotically assisted approach.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

Between January 2005 and February 2006, five patients (mean age 51 years, range 24-68) were diagnosed with urachal anomalies. Two basic robot-assisted surgical approaches were used for excising the urachal anomalies: excision of the urachal remnant via partial cystectomy, and radical cystectomy for excision of urachal adenocarcinoma.

RESULTS

All five cases were successful and the excised specimens were assessed histologically. The short-term oncological outcome in the three patients with histologically confirmed moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma showed no evidence of recurrent disease within a median interval of 8 months. Surveillance follow-up cystoscopy in the patients who had a partial cystectomy showed a well-healed bladder mucosa with no evidence of recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Radical excision of the urachal tract with partial cystectomy or radical cystectomy using the da Vinci robot is safe, effective and technically feasible.

Для цитирования: Madeb Ralph, Knopf Joy K, Nicholson Craig, Donahue Laurence A, Adcock Brian, Dever David, Tan Beng Jit, Valvo John R, Eichel Louis. The use of robotically assisted surgery for treating urachal anomalies.. BJU international. 2006. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2006.06430.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.