Clinical Utility of Optical Genome Mapping as an Additional Tool in a Standard Cytogenetic Workup in Hematological Malignancies.

BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the added value of optical genome mapping (OGM) when integrated into the standard cytogenetic workup (SCGW) for hematological malignancies.

METHODS

The study cohort comprised 519 cases with different types of hematological malignancies. OGM and SCGW (including G-banded karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization) were performed on blood and/or bone marrow. The analytical sensitivity of OGM, defined as the detection of all additional cytogenomic aberrations, and its clinical utility, referring to aberrations with diagnostic, prognostic, or therapeutic significance, were assessed.

RESULTS

OGM led to increased analytical sensitivity and clinical utility in 58% and 15% of the cases, respectively. The clinical utility varied across different malignancies, with the highest utility in T-lymphoblast leukemia (52%), followed by mixed phenotype acute leukemia (43%), B-lymphoblastic leukemia (37%), other B-cell lymphomas (22%), mature T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (20%), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (14%), acute myeloid leukemia (13%), multiple myeloma (13%), mantle cell lymphoma (8%), myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (6%), myelodysplastic syndrome (5%), and myeloproliferative neoplasms (0%).

CONCLUSION

Compared to SCGW, OGM detects additional cytogenomic aberrations in approximately 58% of cases. OGM provides clinical utility at varying rates across different types of hematological malignancies. Given these differences, strategic triaging can help maximize the clinical value of OGM by focusing on diseases where it offers the most significant benefit.