MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.anl.2016.07.004

Медицинская библиотека · Auris, nasus, larynx · 2016

Facial mimetic, cosmetic, and functional standardized assessment of the facial artery musculomucosal (FAMM) flap.

Jowett Nathan, Hadlock Tessa A, Sela Eyal, Toth Miklos, Knecht Rainald, Lörincz Balazs B

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To objectively assess donor site morbidity after harvesting the facial artery musculomucosal flap. Use of the FAMM-flap in oral cavity reconstruction remains sporadic. This case series describes our newly developed standardized assessment of this flap in a floor of mouth (FOM) reconstructive setting.

METHODS

Standardized postoperative assessment of the FAMM flap for donor site wound complications, functional, facial mimetic and oncologic outcomes.

RESULTS

There were no wound complications. Oral competence remained intact, tongue mobility was good to excellent, average word articulation score was 98%, and mimetic function excellent in all patients. Three patients experienced ipsilateral upper lip anesthesia, and five patients were noted to have slight dysfunction of the orbicularis oris resulting in a loss of lip height at rest.

CONCLUSION

The FAMM flap is a reliable option for reconstruction of ablative defects of the FOM, and should be considered a workhorse flap for oral cavity defects. Unlike the submental island flap, a complete level I dissection may be concurrently performed without compromising the vascular supply to the FAMM flap.

Для цитирования: Jowett Nathan, Hadlock Tessa A, Sela Eyal, Toth Miklos, Knecht Rainald, Lörincz Balazs B. Facial mimetic, cosmetic, and functional standardized assessment of the facial artery musculomucosal (FAMM) flap.. Auris, nasus, larynx. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2016.07.004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.