Cell transplantation · 2024
Similar Survival But Less Chronic GVHD in Antithymocyte Globulin-Based Myeloablative Haploidentical Transplant Compared With Matched Sibling Transplant for Adult T-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia/Lymphoma.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gu Zhenyang, Li Fei, Li Meng, Zhang Linlin, Xu Sai, Wang Lu, Wang Lili, Jing Yu, Bo Jian, Gao Chunji, Dou Liping, Liu Daihong
Аннотация
The annual number of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HCT) is increasing steadily. Comparative studies about haplo-HCT versus HCT with HLA-matched sibling donors (MSD-HCT) have been tried in acute myeloid leukemia and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (ALL). Few studies were reported in adult T-cell ALL (T-ALL). In this retrospective study, a total of 88 consecutive patients with T-ALL were enrolled who underwent MSD-HCT (n = 24) and haplo-HCT (n = 64) with antithymocyte globulin (ATG)-based graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis between 2010 and 2022. Median follow-up for survivors was similar (43.5 [range: 7-88] months for MSD-HCT versus 43.5 (range: 6-144) months in the Haplo-HCT group). The 100-day cumulative incidence of grade II to IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) was similar, 33% (95% confidence interval [CI], 16%-52%) after MSD-HCT versus 44% (95% CI, 31%-55%) after haplo-HCT, P = 0.52. The cumulative incidences of grade III-IV aGVHD were 8% (95% CI, 1%-23%) in the MSD-HCT group and 5% (95% CI, 1%-12%) in the haplo-HCT group (P = 0.50). The 2-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (limited and extensive) in the haplo-HCT, 11% (95% CI, 5%-20%) was significantly lower than that in the MSD-HCT group (42% [95% CI, 21%-62%], P = 0.002). The cumulative incidence of 4-year relapse rates (44% versus 37%, P = 0.56) and non-relapse mortality (7% versus 21%, P = 0.08) did not differ between these two groups. There were also no differences in 4-year overall survival (46% versus 47%, P = 0.44) and progression-free survival (49% versus 42%, P = 0.45) between these two groups. On multivariate analysis, using busulfan/fludarabine (BU/Flu) conditioning regimen was found to be associated with worse clinical outcome. Our results suggested that ATG-based haplo-HCT platform could work as an alternative to MSD-HCT for adult patients with T-ALL. Compared with MSD-HCT, haplo-HCT might carry a low risk for cGVHD.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultAntilymphocyte SerumChronic DiseaseGraft vs Host DiseaseHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationRetrospective StudiesSiblingsTransplantation ConditioningTransplantation, HaploidenticalTransplantation, HomologousPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma