Journal of surgical oncology · 2022
A visual deep learning model to predict abnormal versus normal parathyroid glands using intraoperative autofluorescence signals.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Avci Seyma N, Isiktas Gizem, Ergun Onuralp, Berber Eren
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Previous work demonstrated that abnormal versus normal parathyroid glands (PGs) exhibit different patterns of autofluorescence, with former appearing darker and more heterogenous. Our objective was to develop a visual artificial intelligence model using intraoperative autofluorescence signals to predict whether a PG is abnormal (hypersecreting and/or hypercellular) or normal before excision during surgical exploration for primary hyperparathyroidism.
METHODS: A total of 906 intraoperative parathyroid autofluorescence images of 303 patients undergoing parathyroidectomy/thyroidectomy were used to develop model. Autofluorescence image of each PG was uploaded into the visual artificial intelligence platform as abnormal or normal. For deep learning, randomly chosen 80% of data was used for training, 10% for testing, 10% for validation. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), recall (sensitivity), and precision (positive predictive value) of the model were calculated.
RESULTS: AUROC and AUPRC of the model to predict normal and abnormal PGs were 0.90 and 0.93, respectively. Recall and precision of the model were 89% each.
CONCLUSION: Visual artificial intelligence platforms may be used to compare the autofluorescence signal of a given parathyroid gland against a large database. This may be a new adjunctive tool for intraoperative assessment of parathyroid glands during surgical exploration for primary hyperparathyroidism.
METHODS: A total of 906 intraoperative parathyroid autofluorescence images of 303 patients undergoing parathyroidectomy/thyroidectomy were used to develop model. Autofluorescence image of each PG was uploaded into the visual artificial intelligence platform as abnormal or normal. For deep learning, randomly chosen 80% of data was used for training, 10% for testing, 10% for validation. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), recall (sensitivity), and precision (positive predictive value) of the model were calculated.
RESULTS: AUROC and AUPRC of the model to predict normal and abnormal PGs were 0.90 and 0.93, respectively. Recall and precision of the model were 89% each.
CONCLUSION: Visual artificial intelligence platforms may be used to compare the autofluorescence signal of a given parathyroid gland against a large database. This may be a new adjunctive tool for intraoperative assessment of parathyroid glands during surgical exploration for primary hyperparathyroidism.