Journal of clinical periodontology · 2025
Comparison of Healing Outcomes Between Simultaneous and Staged Implant Placement With Sinus Floor Elevation: A Preclinical Study Using a Rabbit Sinus Model.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hong Ji-Youn, Herr Yeek, Naenni Nadja, Thoma Daniel S, Buranawat Borvornwut, Shin Seung-Il, Lim Hyun-Chang
Аннотация
AIM: To compare the histological healing between implants placed simultaneously with maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA) and those placed with a staged approach in the maxillary sinus with thin bone height.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: MSFA was performed on both sides of the sinuses in 10 rabbits, followed by simultaneous implant placement in one of the sinuses (group SMT). Four weeks later, implant placement was performed in the other sinus (group STG). The animals were euthanised 8 weeks thereafter. Micro-computed tomographic and histomorphometric analyses were performed.
RESULTS: In micro-computed tomographic images, the implants were well surrounded by newly formed bone (NB) and bone substitute particles, without statistically significant difference in the volume of NB between the groups (p > 0.05). Histomorphometrically, the amount of NB within the total augmented area and ROIs near the implants did not significantly differ between the groups (p > 0.05). The percentage of bone-to-implant contact was not significantly different between the groups (52.2% ± 16.6% vs. 44.9% ± 18.4%; p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous implant placement with MSFA resulted in comparable radiographic and histological outcomes to a staged implant placement approach in sinuses with thin bone height. However, such outcomes should be cautiously interpreted within the context of an animal model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: MSFA was performed on both sides of the sinuses in 10 rabbits, followed by simultaneous implant placement in one of the sinuses (group SMT). Four weeks later, implant placement was performed in the other sinus (group STG). The animals were euthanised 8 weeks thereafter. Micro-computed tomographic and histomorphometric analyses were performed.
RESULTS: In micro-computed tomographic images, the implants were well surrounded by newly formed bone (NB) and bone substitute particles, without statistically significant difference in the volume of NB between the groups (p > 0.05). Histomorphometrically, the amount of NB within the total augmented area and ROIs near the implants did not significantly differ between the groups (p > 0.05). The percentage of bone-to-implant contact was not significantly different between the groups (52.2% ± 16.6% vs. 44.9% ± 18.4%; p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous implant placement with MSFA resulted in comparable radiographic and histological outcomes to a staged implant placement approach in sinuses with thin bone height. However, such outcomes should be cautiously interpreted within the context of an animal model.