BMC medical imaging · 2026
Yolov7 neural network for pelvic X-rays after total hip arthroplasty: automatically measuring component position parameters- a retrospective feasibility study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li Jiawei, Ding Liangjia, Zhang Kai, Zhang Yunfeng, Gao Shang, Jin Feng, Ji Qingyu, Chen Qingwei, Guo Zhiyong, Lan Wenjie, Wang Haiyan, Zhang Lichun, Li Xiaohe
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: After total hip arthroplasty (THA), regular follow-up X-rays are required to evaluate the position of the prosthesis. However, measuring the parameters of prosthesis position consumes a significant amount of time, and there may be variations in the results obtained by different doctors.
PURPOSE: To validate the feasibility of an artificial intelligence model for the automated measurement of component position parameters on anteroposterior X-rays after THA.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Post-THA anteroposterior X-rays were collected from five hospitals in Inner Mongolia, China. They were divided into training, validation and test sets. The model was divided into left, right, and bilateral THA modules for training. Statistical analysis was performed using Python 3.8 and SPSS 25.0. The accuracy of the model in keypoint detection and measurement were assessed. In addition, we compared the time difference between the model and manual measurements.
RESULTS: A total of 1050 X-rays were included in the training and validation sets (350 X-rays for each module), and 105 in the test set (35 X-rays for each module). Overall, 80.00-100.00% of the model-predicted keypoints fell within 3 mm of the standard keypoints. The model-predicted values were highly consistent with the standard reference values (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.89-0.99, r = 0.83-0.99, root mean square error = 0.96-3.43, mean absolute error = 0.78-2.87, mean difference = -1.29-1.17). The model-predicted values were highly consistent with the measurements of senior attending radiologists. The model took an average of 3.2 s to measure an X-ray image, which is significantly shorter than the 751.76 s in manual measurement.
CONCLUSIONS: This study validates the feasibility of the model for rapid and accurate keypoint identification and component position parameter measurement on anteroposterior X-rays. The model holds promise as a diagnostic aid to alleviate clinicians' workload and facilitate the monitoring of prosthetic positioning changes following THA.
CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
PURPOSE: To validate the feasibility of an artificial intelligence model for the automated measurement of component position parameters on anteroposterior X-rays after THA.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Post-THA anteroposterior X-rays were collected from five hospitals in Inner Mongolia, China. They were divided into training, validation and test sets. The model was divided into left, right, and bilateral THA modules for training. Statistical analysis was performed using Python 3.8 and SPSS 25.0. The accuracy of the model in keypoint detection and measurement were assessed. In addition, we compared the time difference between the model and manual measurements.
RESULTS: A total of 1050 X-rays were included in the training and validation sets (350 X-rays for each module), and 105 in the test set (35 X-rays for each module). Overall, 80.00-100.00% of the model-predicted keypoints fell within 3 mm of the standard keypoints. The model-predicted values were highly consistent with the standard reference values (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.89-0.99, r = 0.83-0.99, root mean square error = 0.96-3.43, mean absolute error = 0.78-2.87, mean difference = -1.29-1.17). The model-predicted values were highly consistent with the measurements of senior attending radiologists. The model took an average of 3.2 s to measure an X-ray image, which is significantly shorter than the 751.76 s in manual measurement.
CONCLUSIONS: This study validates the feasibility of the model for rapid and accurate keypoint identification and component position parameter measurement on anteroposterior X-rays. The model holds promise as a diagnostic aid to alleviate clinicians' workload and facilitate the monitoring of prosthetic positioning changes following THA.
CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.