Management and Outcomes of Urinary Tract Involvement in Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC): A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background and

Objectives

The combined use of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is employed for the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). To achieve optimal cytoreduction, there may be a need for extensive resection and subsequent reconstruction of urologic structures. This study was designed to evaluate the outcomes of urinary tract resection or repair performed in CRS/HIPEC in terms of operative and oncological outcomes. Materials and

Methods

After institutional review board approval, data from 550 consecutive patients who underwent the CRS/HIPEC procedure from January 2007 to July 2018 at six university hospitals was retrieved from prospectively maintained databases. Data from patients who had a concomitant curative resection and reconstruction of the bladder, ureter, or kidney during the CRS/HIPEC procedure were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

A total of 50 out of 550 patients had undergone resection with a repair of the urinary tract due to tumor invasion or iatrogenic injury. Postoperative (within 30 days) urologic complications were observed in 9 of the 50 patients. It was found that having a peritoneal cancer index (PCI) equal to or greater than 20 (p < 0.009) was the sole significant risk factor associated with the occurrence of early urinary complications. Survival time post CRS/HIPEC treatment did not significantly differ between patients with and without urologic complications (median overall survival: 23 vs. 27 months, p = 0.683).

Conclusions

Despite urinary tract issues during CRS/HIPEC for PC, including a PCI over 20 and potential complications from resection or repair, the procedure still offers significant survival benefits.