Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2023
Macrostructural Cerebellar Neuroplasticity Correlates With Motor Recovery After Stroke.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hanakawa Takashi, Hotta Fujiko, Nakamura Tatsuhiro, Shindo Keiichiro, Ushiba Naoko, Hirosawa Masaki, Yamazaki Yutaka, Moriyama Yoshinao, Takagi Syota, Mizuno Katsuhiro, Liu Meigen
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Motor recovery varies across post-stroke individuals, some of whom require a better rehabilitation strategy. We hypothesized that macrostructural neuroplasticity of the motor control network including the cerebellum might underlie individual differences in motor recovery. Objectives. To gain insight into the macrostructural neuroplasticity after stroke, we examined 52 post-stroke individuals using both the Fugl-Meyer assessment and structural magnetic resonance imaging.
METHODS: We performed voxel-based lesion symptom mapping and cross-sectional voxel-based morphometry to correlate the motor scores with the lesion location and the gray matter volume (GMV), respectively. Longitudinal data were available at ~8 and/or 15 weeks after admission from 43 individuals with supratentorial lesions. We performed a longitudinal VBM analysis followed by a multiple regression analysis to correlate between the changes of the motor assessment scores and those of GMV overtime.
RESULTS: We found a cross-sectional correlation of residual motor functioning with GMV in the ipsilesional cerebellum and contralesional parietal cortex. Longitudinally, we found increases in GMV in the ipsilesional supplementary motor area, and the ipsilesional superior and inferior cerebellar zones, along with a GMV decrease in the ipsilesional thalamus. The motor recovery was correlated with the GMV changes in the superior and inferior cerebellar zones. The regaining of upper-limb motor functioning was correlated with the GMV changes of both superior and inferior cerebellum while that of lower-limb motor functioning with the GMV increase of the inferior cerebellum only.
CONCLUSIONS: The present findings support the hypothesis that macrostructural cerebellar neuroplasticity is correlated with individual differences in motor recovery after stroke.
METHODS: We performed voxel-based lesion symptom mapping and cross-sectional voxel-based morphometry to correlate the motor scores with the lesion location and the gray matter volume (GMV), respectively. Longitudinal data were available at ~8 and/or 15 weeks after admission from 43 individuals with supratentorial lesions. We performed a longitudinal VBM analysis followed by a multiple regression analysis to correlate between the changes of the motor assessment scores and those of GMV overtime.
RESULTS: We found a cross-sectional correlation of residual motor functioning with GMV in the ipsilesional cerebellum and contralesional parietal cortex. Longitudinally, we found increases in GMV in the ipsilesional supplementary motor area, and the ipsilesional superior and inferior cerebellar zones, along with a GMV decrease in the ipsilesional thalamus. The motor recovery was correlated with the GMV changes in the superior and inferior cerebellar zones. The regaining of upper-limb motor functioning was correlated with the GMV changes of both superior and inferior cerebellum while that of lower-limb motor functioning with the GMV increase of the inferior cerebellum only.
CONCLUSIONS: The present findings support the hypothesis that macrostructural cerebellar neuroplasticity is correlated with individual differences in motor recovery after stroke.