MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s13550-024-01190-7

Медицинская библиотека · EJNMMI research · 2025

Do you know your PSMA-tracer? Variability in the biodistribution of different PSMA ligands and its potential impact on defining PSMA-positivity prior to PSMA-targeted therapy.

Heilinger Jan, Roth Katrin Sabine, Weis Henning, Fink Antonis, Weindler Jasmin, Dietlein Felix, Krapf Philipp, Schomäcker Klaus, Neumaier Bernd, Dietlein Markus, Drzezga Alexander, Kobe Carsten

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

In clinical practice, several radiopharmaceuticals are used for PSMA-PET imaging, each with distinct biodistribution patterns. This may impact treatment decisions and outcomes, as eligibility for PSMA-directed radioligand therapy is usually assessed by comparing tumoral uptake to normal liver uptake as a reference. In this study, we aimed to compare tracer uptake intraindividually in various reference regions including liver, parotid gland and spleen as well as the respective tumor-to-background ratios (TBR) of different 18F-labeled PSMA ligands to today's standard radiopharmaceutical 68Ga-PSMA-11 in a series of patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer who underwent a dual PSMA-PET examination as part of an individualized diagnostic approach.

RESULTS

Differences in background activity among different PSMA-PET tracers lead to variations in tumor-to-background ratios (TBR). In [18F]F-DCFPyL-PET, TBR with the liver as the reference organ (TBRliver) was comparable to [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11-PET, while [18F]F-PSMA-1007-PET and [18F]F-JK-PSMA-7-PET showed significantly lower values. Using the parotid gland as the reference (TBRparotidgland), [18F]F-DCFPyL-PET exhibited significantly higher values, whereas [18F]F-PSMA-1007-PET and [18F]F-JK-PSMA-7-PET were comparable. For the spleen (TBRspleen), [18F]F-JK-PSMA-7-PET was comparable, but [18F]F-DCFPyL-PET and [18F]F-PSMA-1007-PET showed significantly higher and lower values, respectively. An additional Bland-Altman analyses revealed low bias for [18F]F-DCFPyL-PET in TBRparotidgland, whereas significant differences in TBRliver and TBRspleen for the other tracers resulted in higher bias.

CONCLUSION

Different PSMA-PET tracers exhibit distinct biodistribution patterns, leading to variations in tumor-to-background ratios (TBR) in reference organs such as the liver, parotid gland, and spleen. Patient selection for PSMA-directed radioligand therapy is currently based on a semiquantitative approach using the liver as a reference region in [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11-PET. Thus, the use of alternative [18F]-labeled tracers may result in under- or overestimation of a patient's suitability for therapy. This highlights the importance of a comprehensive understanding of the differences in tracer-specific uptake behavior for accurate decisions regarding PSMA-expression levels. However, as the patient cohort in this study is at earlier disease stages, the generalizability of these findings to later-stage patients remains unclear and requires further investigation.

Для цитирования: Heilinger Jan, Roth Katrin Sabine, Weis Henning, Fink Antonis, Weindler Jasmin, Dietlein Felix, Krapf Philipp, Schomäcker Klaus, Neumaier Bernd, Dietlein Markus, Drzezga Alexander, Kobe Carsten. Do you know your PSMA-tracer? Variability in the biodistribution of different PSMA ligands and its potential impact on defining PSMA-positivity prior to PSMA-targeted therapy.. EJNMMI research. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s13550-024-01190-7.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.