MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/bjr/tqaf218

Медицинская библиотека · The British journal of radiology · 2026

Evaluation of size-specific dose estimates in CT kidneys, ureters, and bladder scans: comparison of central-slice and full-slices methods using water-equivalent and effective diameters.

Alenazi Khaled, Abuhaimed Abdullah, Alanazi Ali, Alshehri Sultan, Abanomy Ahmad, Alahmad Haitham

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in adult patients undergoing kidneys, ureters, and bladder (CT KUB) scans using 2 approaches: water-equivalent diameter (Dw) and effective diameter (Deff). The study also aimed to assess the accuracy of using a single central image slice for SSDE estimation.

METHODOLOGY: Ethical approval was obtained to collect patient data from a local hospital. CT images from 203 adult patients were retrieved and processed using IndoseCT software to calculate patient size metrics and corresponding SSDE values.

RESULTS

SSDE values calculated using the Dw,mean and Deff,mean were comparable: 10.3 ± 2.9 mGy and 10.2 ± 2.9 mGy, respectively. When using a single central slice, the mean percentage differences were -1.8 ± 3.9% for Dw and -1.1 ± 4.6% for Deff, with all values falling within ±11%. A strong correlation was observed between SSDE values derived from single-slice and full-slice measurements (R2 > 0.97), showing slightly better agreement for Dw.

CONCLUSION

While Dw offers a more accurate estimation of patient size, the minimal differences observed suggest that Deff is a suitable alternative when Dw specific tools are unavailable. Additionally, using a single central slice is a practical and efficient method to estimate SSDE, significantly reducing computational demands.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study provides clinical validation that SSDE can be reliably estimated using a single-slice method in CT KUB examinations, offering a substantial reduction in processing time. It also demonstrates that Deff is a viable substitute for Dw when access to advanced imaging analysis tools is limited.

Для цитирования: Alenazi Khaled, Abuhaimed Abdullah, Alanazi Ali, Alshehri Sultan, Abanomy Ahmad, Alahmad Haitham. Evaluation of size-specific dose estimates in CT kidneys, ureters, and bladder scans: comparison of central-slice and full-slices methods using water-equivalent and effective diameters.. The British journal of radiology. 2026. DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqaf218.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.