Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026
Coronary Physiologic Burden Assessed by Mean Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Predicts Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Legaspi Enrico Paolo, Serruys Patrick W, Tsai Tsung-Ying, Tsai Yi-Lin, Chen Su-Chan, Lee Ching-Wei, Revaiah Pruthvi C, Chen Tai-Wei, Hsu Chiao-Po, Chang Chun-Chin, Sung Shih-Hsien
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease frequently coexists with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and contributes to adverse outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Conventional lesion-based assessments may underestimate the cumulative impact of diffuse coronary physiologic impairment in this population. This study evaluated the prognostic significance of mean angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (vFFR) as a patient-level marker of coronary physiologic burden in patients undergoing TAVI.
METHODS: Between January 2017 and April 2022, 164 patients with severe AS who underwent coronary angiography prior to TAVI without significant epicardial stenosis (< 70%) were retrospectively analyzed. vFFR values were computed for all three major coronary arteries, and mean vFFR was calculated for each patient. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization (HFH). Mean vFFR was analyzed as a continuous variable.
RESULTS: Patients had an overall mean vFFR of 0.89 ± 0.07 and were stratified into high (> 0.85) or low (≤ 0.85) vFFR cohorts. During a mean follow-up of 1241 ± 867 days, the primary endpoint occurred in 43 patients (26.2%). Lower mean vFFR, lower left ventricular ejection fraction, higher NT-proBNP levels, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, and higher STS score were associated with adverse outcomes. In contrast, the lowest single-vessel vFFR was not associated with the primary endpoint. When analyzed as a continuous variable, each 0.1 decrease in mean vFFR was independently associated with a higher risk of the composite outcome (adjusted hazard ratio 1.62, 95% CI 1.03-2.55; p = 0.035). Restricted cubic spline analysis demonstrated a non-linear inverse relationship between mean vFFR and clinical risk.
CONCLUSIONS: Lower mean vFFR, reflecting greater coronary physiologic burden, was independently associated with adverse clinical outcomes after TAVI, even in the absence of angiographically significant stenosis. These findings suggest that patient-level physiologic impairment may provide incremental prognostic information beyond lesion-based assessment, supporting a more physiology-informed approach to coronary evaluation in patients undergoing TAVI.
METHODS: Between January 2017 and April 2022, 164 patients with severe AS who underwent coronary angiography prior to TAVI without significant epicardial stenosis (< 70%) were retrospectively analyzed. vFFR values were computed for all three major coronary arteries, and mean vFFR was calculated for each patient. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization (HFH). Mean vFFR was analyzed as a continuous variable.
RESULTS: Patients had an overall mean vFFR of 0.89 ± 0.07 and were stratified into high (> 0.85) or low (≤ 0.85) vFFR cohorts. During a mean follow-up of 1241 ± 867 days, the primary endpoint occurred in 43 patients (26.2%). Lower mean vFFR, lower left ventricular ejection fraction, higher NT-proBNP levels, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, and higher STS score were associated with adverse outcomes. In contrast, the lowest single-vessel vFFR was not associated with the primary endpoint. When analyzed as a continuous variable, each 0.1 decrease in mean vFFR was independently associated with a higher risk of the composite outcome (adjusted hazard ratio 1.62, 95% CI 1.03-2.55; p = 0.035). Restricted cubic spline analysis demonstrated a non-linear inverse relationship between mean vFFR and clinical risk.
CONCLUSIONS: Lower mean vFFR, reflecting greater coronary physiologic burden, was independently associated with adverse clinical outcomes after TAVI, even in the absence of angiographically significant stenosis. These findings suggest that patient-level physiologic impairment may provide incremental prognostic information beyond lesion-based assessment, supporting a more physiology-informed approach to coronary evaluation in patients undergoing TAVI.