Effect of reduced ultrafiltration rate on the cardiac biomarkers NT-proBNP and troponin T: a prospective crossover study.

BACKGROUND

High interdialytic weight gain (IDWG) and ultrafiltration rate have been associated with increased mortality in patients undergoing haemodialysis. Cardiac biomarkers reflecting strain, including N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and high-sensitivity troponin T (TnT), are known to increase during haemodialysis sessions. Previous studies suggest that these intradialytic increases may be related to ultrafiltration rate, with a proposed threshold of 0.6 IDWG per hour. This study therefore aimed to prospectively evaluate whether reducing ultrafiltration rate attenuates the haemodialysis-associated increase in these cardiac biomarkers.

METHOD: In this multicentre, prospective study prevalent haemodialysis patients with a relative IDWG > 2.5% of body weight and ultrafiltration rate ≥ 0.72 IDWG per hour underwent one standard and one prolonged haemodialysis session with a ≥ 20% reduction in ultrafiltration rate, targeting an ultrafiltration rate ≤ 0.6 IDWG per hour. NT-proBNP and TnT were analysed directly before dialysis, at 180 minutes, and at the end of each haemodialysis session.

RESULTS

Of 238 screened patients, 65 met the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria. Of these, 56 were enrolled and 41 included in the final analysis, meeting the pre-specified sample size required to detect a clinically relevant difference. NT-proBNP and TnT increased significantly during both dialysis sessions (p < 0.001). However, no difference was observed in ∆NT-proBNP (p = 0.967) or ∆TnT (p = 0.823) between treatments with different ultrafiltration rates. Achieving an ultrafiltration rate ≤ 0.6 IDWG per hour required a mean treatment duration of 423 ± 139 minutes (min 246, max 775). Among the 12 patients (29.3%) who achieved the targeted ultrafiltration rate of ≤0.6 IDWG per hour, changes in NT-proBNP (p = 0.062) and TnT (p = 0.114) did not differ significantly between sessions with different ultrafiltration rates.

CONCLUSIONS

In stable, prevalent haemodialysis patients who tolerate their ordinary treatment, reducing the ultrafiltration rate by at least 20% did not attenuate the increase in NT-proBNP and TnT during a single haemodialysis session. In these patients, achieving an ultrafiltration rate ≤ 0.6 IDWG/h generally required treatment durations that are not feasible in routine in-centre haemodialysis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06153888) November 6 2023 (Retrospectively registered).