International journal of surgery case reports · 2023
Complex case of ureteropelvic junction obstruction with bifid renal pelvis in ectopic kidney: A rare combination.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
El Boté Hicham, Bellouki Omar, Bouljrouf Jaouad, Lakssir Jihad, Boughaleb Abdelmounim, Mikou Mohamed Ali
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Renal pelvis bifidity, ectopic pelvic kidney, and ureteropelvic junction obstruction are rare urinary tract anomalies resulting from embryological developmental variations. Their coexistence in one kidney is exceedingly uncommon.
CASE PRESENTATION: An 18-year-old male with no prior medical history presented with right-sided lumbar pain. A CT scan revealed bilateral hydronephrosis, with the left kidney being malrotated and ectopically positioned in the pelvis. Dynamic renal scintigraphy confirmed bilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Surgical management involved laparoscopic pyeloplasty for the right UPJ and open surgery for the left ectopic kidney with bifid pelvis.
DISCUSSION: The combination of pelvic kidney, renal pelvis bifidity, and bilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction is exceptionally rare. Diagnosis often occurs incidentally or when symptoms related to these anomalies emerge. Imaging and dynamic renal scintigraphy play crucial roles in diagnosis. Individualized surgical management is essential for positive outcomes.
CONCLUSION: This case highlights the need for individualized management in complex urological cases involving rare anatomical variations. Surgeon experience and a comprehensive understanding of such anomalies are crucial for successful outcomes.
CASE PRESENTATION: An 18-year-old male with no prior medical history presented with right-sided lumbar pain. A CT scan revealed bilateral hydronephrosis, with the left kidney being malrotated and ectopically positioned in the pelvis. Dynamic renal scintigraphy confirmed bilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Surgical management involved laparoscopic pyeloplasty for the right UPJ and open surgery for the left ectopic kidney with bifid pelvis.
DISCUSSION: The combination of pelvic kidney, renal pelvis bifidity, and bilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction is exceptionally rare. Diagnosis often occurs incidentally or when symptoms related to these anomalies emerge. Imaging and dynamic renal scintigraphy play crucial roles in diagnosis. Individualized surgical management is essential for positive outcomes.
CONCLUSION: This case highlights the need for individualized management in complex urological cases involving rare anatomical variations. Surgeon experience and a comprehensive understanding of such anomalies are crucial for successful outcomes.