Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2026
Positive Psychology Interventions for Adults With Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bhattarai Muna, Shigemoto Yuki, Bajracharya Snehi
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To systematically synthesize the evidence on the effect of positive psychology interventions (PPIs) on health and wellbeing outcomes in adults with spinal cord injury (SCI).
DATA SOURCES: We performed a comprehensive search across 6 electronic databases: Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, SPORTDiscus, and CENTRAL (Cochrane Library).
STUDY SELECTION: We included interventional studies published between 2000 and 2025. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they involved individuals with SCI and implemented PPIs aligned with Seligman's Positive Emotion, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning, and Accomplishment model. Studies with all health and wellbeing outcomes were included. The initial search retrieved 8288 studies, of which 8 met the eligibility criteria for inclusion in the systematic review.
DATA EXTRACTION: Two independent reviewers extracted data on study designs, intervention characteristics, outcome measures, and key findings using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline. Meta-analyses were performed for outcomes reported in at least 3 studies.
DATA SYNTHESIS: The systematic review included 8 studies, and the meta-analyses included 7 of them. Of the 8 studies, 7 integrated 1 or more PPI components within their interventions, whereas only 1 study was fully grounded in a positive psychology framework. Results from the systematic review suggest the significant positive effects of PPIs on selected physical, emotional, and psychosocial outcomes. In meta-analyses conducted for self-efficacy, life satisfaction, anxiety, and depression outcomes, the standardized mean differences were statistically significant for self-efficacy, life satisfaction, and anxiety. However, evidence on the follow-up or long-term effects of PPIs remains limited or inconsistent.
CONCLUSIONS: The PPIs or PPI-derived components exert beneficial effects on various health and wellbeing outcomes, particularly in emotional or psychological health. Nevertheless, further research using standardized, full-scale PPI and a larger sample is essential to establish these interventions as potential mainstream interventions within SCI rehabilitation.
DATA SOURCES: We performed a comprehensive search across 6 electronic databases: Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, SPORTDiscus, and CENTRAL (Cochrane Library).
STUDY SELECTION: We included interventional studies published between 2000 and 2025. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they involved individuals with SCI and implemented PPIs aligned with Seligman's Positive Emotion, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning, and Accomplishment model. Studies with all health and wellbeing outcomes were included. The initial search retrieved 8288 studies, of which 8 met the eligibility criteria for inclusion in the systematic review.
DATA EXTRACTION: Two independent reviewers extracted data on study designs, intervention characteristics, outcome measures, and key findings using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline. Meta-analyses were performed for outcomes reported in at least 3 studies.
DATA SYNTHESIS: The systematic review included 8 studies, and the meta-analyses included 7 of them. Of the 8 studies, 7 integrated 1 or more PPI components within their interventions, whereas only 1 study was fully grounded in a positive psychology framework. Results from the systematic review suggest the significant positive effects of PPIs on selected physical, emotional, and psychosocial outcomes. In meta-analyses conducted for self-efficacy, life satisfaction, anxiety, and depression outcomes, the standardized mean differences were statistically significant for self-efficacy, life satisfaction, and anxiety. However, evidence on the follow-up or long-term effects of PPIs remains limited or inconsistent.
CONCLUSIONS: The PPIs or PPI-derived components exert beneficial effects on various health and wellbeing outcomes, particularly in emotional or psychological health. Nevertheless, further research using standardized, full-scale PPI and a larger sample is essential to establish these interventions as potential mainstream interventions within SCI rehabilitation.