Hip & pelvis · 2026
Mortality and Functional Outcomes of Liberal versus Restrictive Blood Transfusion in Elderly Patients after Hip Surgery: A Randomised Control Trial.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Patil Virendra Eknath, Barick Devashis, Degloorkar Pawankumar, Rokade Sarang, Aakarsh
Аннотация
PURPOSE: There is ongoing debate on the haemoglobin level at which red cell transfusion should be administered following surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the benefits of a restrictive blood transfusion strategy and assess potential adverse effects of anaemia in the immediate postoperative phase, determining whether a liberal transfusion approach still remains necessary.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized control trial compared two groups: Group 1, with a liberal blood transfusion strategy, and Group 2, with a restrictive blood transfusion protocol. Haemoglobin levels were measured on the 3rd and 12th postoperative days, and at 1-month follow-up. Clinical and functional evaluations were conducted at the 1-month follow-up.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the liberal and restrictive groups in 10 feet walking with support at 12 days and at 1 month. The restrictive group had a shorter hospital stay (17.57±4.66 days) compared to the liberal group (19.56±5.34 days). Incidence of surgical site infections were similar (4.0% in liberal, 2.0% in restrictive), and no mortalities were observed in either group at the 1-month follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Both liberal and restrictive transfusion strategies were similarly effective in terms of early postoperative mortality and functional mobility. However, patients in the liberal transfusion group had a significantly longer length of stay compared to the restrictive group. Leading us to conclude that a restrictive strategy is effective and beneficial for patients and hospitals provided there are no signs of anaemia or a haemoglobin drop below 8 g/dL.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized control trial compared two groups: Group 1, with a liberal blood transfusion strategy, and Group 2, with a restrictive blood transfusion protocol. Haemoglobin levels were measured on the 3rd and 12th postoperative days, and at 1-month follow-up. Clinical and functional evaluations were conducted at the 1-month follow-up.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the liberal and restrictive groups in 10 feet walking with support at 12 days and at 1 month. The restrictive group had a shorter hospital stay (17.57±4.66 days) compared to the liberal group (19.56±5.34 days). Incidence of surgical site infections were similar (4.0% in liberal, 2.0% in restrictive), and no mortalities were observed in either group at the 1-month follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Both liberal and restrictive transfusion strategies were similarly effective in terms of early postoperative mortality and functional mobility. However, patients in the liberal transfusion group had a significantly longer length of stay compared to the restrictive group. Leading us to conclude that a restrictive strategy is effective and beneficial for patients and hospitals provided there are no signs of anaemia or a haemoglobin drop below 8 g/dL.