European journal of haematology · 2016
Activity of aldehyde dehydrogenase in B-cell and plasma cell subsets of monoclonal gammopathy patients and healthy donors.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Všianská Pavla, Bezděková Renata, Kryukov Fedor, Almáši Martina, Pour Luděk, Penka Miroslav, Hájek Roman, Říhová Lucie
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) is highly active in physiological stem cells as well as in tumor-initiating cells of some malignancies including multiple myeloma (MM). Finding higher activity of ALDH in some cell subsets in monoclonal gammopathies (MG) could identify potential source of myeloma-initiating cells (MICs).
METHODS: Bone marrow of 12 MM, 9 monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), and 10 healthy donors (HD) were analyzed by flow cytometry. ALDH activity of B-cells and plasma cells (PC) was analyzed using Aldefluor.
RESULTS: Similar changes of ALDH activity were found during B-cell development in HD and MG. Decreasing of ALDH activity from immature to naïve B-cells was found. In postgerminal stages, the activity started to increase, and in PCs, the ALDH activity was the same as in immature B-cells. Increased ALDH activity of all PC subsets compared to naïve B-cells was found in MM as well as in HD, while in MGUS, only CD19- PCs have higher ALDH activity. In HD, ALDH activity was higher in CD19+ PCs compared with MG.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that changes of ALDH activity are the natural phenomenon in B-cell development; thus, high ALDH activity as a single marker is not appropriate for MICs identification.
METHODS: Bone marrow of 12 MM, 9 monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), and 10 healthy donors (HD) were analyzed by flow cytometry. ALDH activity of B-cells and plasma cells (PC) was analyzed using Aldefluor.
RESULTS: Similar changes of ALDH activity were found during B-cell development in HD and MG. Decreasing of ALDH activity from immature to naïve B-cells was found. In postgerminal stages, the activity started to increase, and in PCs, the ALDH activity was the same as in immature B-cells. Increased ALDH activity of all PC subsets compared to naïve B-cells was found in MM as well as in HD, while in MGUS, only CD19- PCs have higher ALDH activity. In HD, ALDH activity was higher in CD19+ PCs compared with MG.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that changes of ALDH activity are the natural phenomenon in B-cell development; thus, high ALDH activity as a single marker is not appropriate for MICs identification.