m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Research square · 2025

A Delphi Study to prioritize implementation strategies to increase the adoption of screening and referral for brain injury among survivors of intimate partner violence and sexual assault within community-based organizations.

СтатьяПрепринтНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Rajaram Shireen S, Pereira Emiliane Lemos, Chiou Kathy, Reisher Peggy, Wichman Christopher, Miller Megan N, Estabrooks Paul A

Аннотация

BACKGROUND: Women who experience intimate partner violence (IPV) are at a high risk for injuries to the head, neck, and face that can result in a traumatic brain injury (BI). Despite increasing evidence of the high risk for BI in this vulnerable population, BI screenings remain critically under-implemented in community-based organizations (CBOs) serving IPV survivors. The aim of this community-engaged dissemination and implementation project was to co-identify implementation strategies to increase the adoption of brain injury (BI) screening and referral within intimate partner violence (IPV)-serving CBOs.

METHODS: We used a modified Delphi method to prioritize 47 CBO relevant strategies from the Expert Recommendations for Implementation Change compendium to increase the adoption of BI screening and referral among IPV-serving CBOs. In Round-1, 14 Community-campus advisory board (CAB) members, including representatives from 10 CBOs prioritized relevant strategies in a virtual meeting. In Round-2, 62 CBOs staff members responded to a survey to refine a subset of prioritized strategies to 6-8 primary strategies that could be tested across the CBOs.

RESULTS: CAB participants identified 21 strategies as particularly relevant to CBOs including 4 educational, 2 technical assistance, 5 staff and leadership, 4 management and evaluation, and 6 organizational workflow strategies. Survey responses indicated rated 7 of the 21 strategies were most consistently rated as relevant and feasible. The final list of 7 strategies included training opportunities, ongoing consultation, developing implementation plans, establishing local screening and referral protocols, soliciting survivor feedback, promoting adaptability, and tailoring strategies to CBOs contexts.

CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the importance of creating tailored implementation strategies within IPV-serving CBOs to enhance the adoption of brain injury screening and referral protocols. The identified strategies offer valuable insights into optimizing support for IPV survivors and advancing public health interventions.

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты