Analysis of Upper-Limb Movement Characteristics in Tennis Volleys Based on Skill-Level Differences: Kinematic Features of the Backhand Versus Forehand Volley.

Background

In tennis, the volley is an important shot; however, studies describing its movement characteristics have been limited to the forehand volley (FV). In this study, we analyzed the characteristics of upper-limb movement during FV and backhand volley (BV) in skilled and less-skilled tennis players.

Methods

Twelve tennis players with experience (skilled group) and eight with little experience (less-skilled group) were included. The participants stood in front of a simulated net and volleyed balls were fed toward the target. Movements were recorded using three video cameras, and three-dimensional coordinates were obtained using the direct linear transformation method. The measured variables were bilateral shoulder rotation angle, pelvic rotation angle, shoulder-pelvis twist angle, and the racket-forearm angle. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted with player level (skilled vs. less skilled) and time point (backswing event vs. impact event) as factors.

Results

In the FV, a significant main effect of time point was observed for the bilateral shoulder rotation angle (F1,18 = 7.471, p = 0.014, η2 = 0.293). In the BV, significant main effects at both player level and time point were observed for the pelvic rotation (player level; F1,18 = 8.759, p = 0.008, η2 = 0.327, time point; F1,18 = 13.351, p = 0.002, η2 = 0.426). Also, significant main effects at both player level and time point were observed for racket-forearm angles (player level; F1,18 = 6.752, p = 0.018, η2 = 0.273, time point; F1,18 = 10.213, p = 0.005, η2 = 0.362). However, a significant main effect of the player level was observed for the shoulder-pelvis twist angle (F1,18 = 12.124, p = 0.003, η2 = 0.402).

Conclusions

In contrast to FV, BV prioritizes ball control by maintaining the shoulder-pelvis angular relationship without releasing the twist. These results suggest that skill-related differences in volleying are more pronounced in the BV than in the FV.