Spinal cord hemangioblastomas in von Hippel-Lindau disease.
Аннотация
STUDY
DESIGN
Retrospective data analysis.
OBJECTIVE
To clarify the clinical features and surgical management of spinal cord hemangioblastomas in patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHL).
SETTING
Clinical VHL Research Group in Japan, Japan.
METHODS
Forty-eight out of 66 patients with associated spinal cord hemangioblastoma among 142 VHL patients were retrospectively examined with respect to clinical features, accompanying lesions and outcome of surgical treatment.
RESULTS
Among these 48 patients, 46 of them (95.8%) also had a central nervous system (CNS) hemangioblastoma at another site: 42 (87.5%) with cerebellar hemangioblastoma and 11 (22.9%) with brain stem hemangioblastoma. Twenty-three patients (47.9%) had more than one spinal cord hemangioblastoma. The 48 patients with spinal cord hemangioblastomas collectively had a total of 74 tumors. The tumor was accompanied with a syrinx in 64 and without it in 10 patients. Forty of the 48 patients underwent surgical treatment for their spinal cord hemangioblastomas, and 7 of these 40 underwent surgical treatment twice. When functional changes in the patients after these 47 operations were examined by postoperative evaluation by McCormick's classification, 39 of these operations (83.0%) resulted in improvement/no change and 8 (17.0%) in aggravation of symptoms.
CONCLUSION
Von Hippel-Lindau disease patients bearing spinal cord hemangioblastomas mostly had a CNS hemangioblastoma at another site. These tumors can be removed in the majority of VHL patients without aggravation. In these patients, when the timing of treatment for spinal cord hemangioblastoma is determined, the probability of occurrence and treatment of other lesions should be considered.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.