MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Zhonghua zheng xing wai ke za zhi = Zhonghua zhengxing waike zazhi = Chinese journal of plastic surgery · 2013

[Clinical experience of penile augmentation with superficial fascia retrocession: a report of 60 cases].

Li Xia, Wang Hai-Tao, Yang Jin-Cun, Huo Ran, Zhang Cheng, Hu Nan

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical effect of penile augmentation with superficial fascia retrocession.

METHODS

The first annular incision line was designed, reserving the inner plate 0.5 -0.8 cm. The second annular incision line was determined, according to the length of penile erection. The skin tissue between the double loops was stripped, reserving the superficial fascia and the superficial dorsal veins. Before the closure of two annual incision with no tension, the superficial fascia tissue was pushed proximally and fixed sectionally to augment penis.

RESULTS

From Jun 2009 to Jun 2011, 60 patients with redundant prepuce or phimosis were treated with this method. During 3 to 12 months follow-up, the postoperative penile perimeter increased significantly. The glans were exposed and the prepuce looked smooth. The function of the penis maintained undamaged.

CONCLUSIONS

The penile augmentation with superficial fascia retrocession can make full use of autologous tissue to augment penis, meanwhile, redundant prepuce can be resected. It is very practical for clinical application.

Для цитирования: Li Xia, Wang Hai-Tao, Yang Jin-Cun, Huo Ran, Zhang Cheng, Hu Nan. [Clinical experience of penile augmentation with superficial fascia retrocession: a report of 60 cases].. Zhonghua zheng xing wai ke za zhi = Zhonghua zhengxing waike zazhi = Chinese journal of plastic surgery. 2013.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.