MedElevator
Войти в исследования The British journal of radiology · 2026
Enhanced setup and positioning accuracy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiotherapy: a customized cushion/mask/bite-block immobilization approach.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhang Yanxin, Hou Yichen, Liu Yang, Huan Fukui, Wan Bao, Zhu Gengqiang, Zhou Ke, Zhang Kun, Geng Songsong, Yi Junlin, Wu Runye
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a customized cushion/mask/bite-block (CMB) immobilization strategy was superior to the standard head and neck immobilization system in terms of enhancing setup and positioning accuracy across diverse anatomical planes during IMRT for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).
METHODS: This study analysed CBCT images of 22 patients undergoing IMRT for NPC, assessing setup errors at distinct anatomical levels (sphenoid, C1, C4, C7, mandible) and calculating corresponding CTV-PTV margin expansions. Intra-fractional positional uncertainties were also evaluated. Differences in setup errors, required PTV margins and intra-fractional positional accuracy were compared between the 2 groups.
RESULTS: The CMB group showed significant improvement in inter-fractional setup error within the ROI for PTV compared to the standard headrest group. Compared with the standard headrest group, the CMB group significantly reduced systematic and random errors, especially in the X (left-right) and Y (superior-inferior) directions. The respective systematic and random errors (mm) were as follows: X (0.73 ± 0.98 vs. 1.16 ± 0.99), Y (1.12 ± 0.86 vs. 1.70 ± 0.96), and Z (0.86 ± 1.12 vs. 0.85 ± 1.14). Furthermore, the CMB group significantly improved the positional repeatability of various local ROIs (sphenoid, C1, C4, C7, and mandible). Additionally, the CMB group had reduced CTV-PTV margin expansions in the 3 directions.
CONCLUSION: Compared to the standard headrest group, the CMB immobilization protocol significantly improved setup and positioning accuracy for IMRT in NPC patients, reducing the need for PTV margin expansion across various anatomical levels. This novel immobilization approach was deemed effective, simple, and robust during IMRT for NPC.
ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study provides valuable clinical insights into improving setup and positioning accuracy at various anatomical levels during IMRT for NPC.
METHODS: This study analysed CBCT images of 22 patients undergoing IMRT for NPC, assessing setup errors at distinct anatomical levels (sphenoid, C1, C4, C7, mandible) and calculating corresponding CTV-PTV margin expansions. Intra-fractional positional uncertainties were also evaluated. Differences in setup errors, required PTV margins and intra-fractional positional accuracy were compared between the 2 groups.
RESULTS: The CMB group showed significant improvement in inter-fractional setup error within the ROI for PTV compared to the standard headrest group. Compared with the standard headrest group, the CMB group significantly reduced systematic and random errors, especially in the X (left-right) and Y (superior-inferior) directions. The respective systematic and random errors (mm) were as follows: X (0.73 ± 0.98 vs. 1.16 ± 0.99), Y (1.12 ± 0.86 vs. 1.70 ± 0.96), and Z (0.86 ± 1.12 vs. 0.85 ± 1.14). Furthermore, the CMB group significantly improved the positional repeatability of various local ROIs (sphenoid, C1, C4, C7, and mandible). Additionally, the CMB group had reduced CTV-PTV margin expansions in the 3 directions.
CONCLUSION: Compared to the standard headrest group, the CMB immobilization protocol significantly improved setup and positioning accuracy for IMRT in NPC patients, reducing the need for PTV margin expansion across various anatomical levels. This novel immobilization approach was deemed effective, simple, and robust during IMRT for NPC.
ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study provides valuable clinical insights into improving setup and positioning accuracy at various anatomical levels during IMRT for NPC.