DOI 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2018.01.015
[Impact of primary tumor site on the prognosis in different stage colorectal cancer patients after radical resection].
Аннотация
Objective
To analyze the effect to the prognosis of tumor site on the patients of colorectal cancer after curative resection with different stage.
Methods
Clinicopathological and follow-up data of 2 097 colorectal carcinoma cases undergoing resection at Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from January 2008 to March 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 421 patients in left-sided colorectal cancer (LCC) group (including carcinoma in cecum, ascending colon , hepatic flexure, and transvers colon) , 386 in right-sided colorectal cancer (RCC) group (including carcinoma in splenic flexure, descending colon and sigmoid colon) and 1 290 in rectal cancer (RECC) group. Clinicopathologic features in patients with different tumor location were compared. 5-year overall survival rate were compared among the 3 groups. Patients were stratified by different stage to analyze the effect of tumor location on the prognosis. χ(2)test and Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum test were used to compare the clinicopathological features among the 3 groups, Kaplan-Meier curve and Log-rank test were used to analyze prognosis, respectively.
Results
No significant differences were identified between the three groups in age, family history, N stage and intestinal obstruction. Significant difference were found in gender among LCC, RCC and RECC group (male were 62.5% vs. 54.9% vs.56.3%, χ(2)=6.040, P=0.049) . Compared with LCC group and RCC group, RECC group had more well and moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma patients (89.7% vs. 86.0% vs. 82.4%, χ(2)=10.712 and 17.385, P=0.013 and 0.001) , more stage Ⅰ patients (17.1% vs. 6.9% vs. 6.5%, χ(2)=37.459 and 37.208, P=0.000 and 0.000) , and less likely to be stage T4 (44.7% vs. 76.7% vs.78.5%, χ(2)=128.015 and 133.704, P=0.000 and 0.000), metastasis (2.6% vs. 5.7% vs. 3.6%, χ(2)=1 417.167 and 1 424.217, P=0.000 and 0.000) and intestinal obstruction (11.3% vs. 21.1% vs. 24.4%, χ(2)=25.846 and 41.141, P=0.000 and 0.000). Five-year survival rate reduced in turn in the patients with RECC, LCC and RCC(70.9%, 59.8%, 58.9%, χ(2)=11.577, P=0.009). In the subgroup of stage Ⅲ, patients with different tumor location had different overall survival (χ(2)=9.878, P=0.007). Compared to right-sided colon cancer patients, rectal ones had significantly better overall survival (χ(2)=9.271, P=0.002); but in the subgroup of stage Ⅰ, Ⅱ and stage Ⅳ, patients with different tumor location had similar overall survival (P were 0.124, 0.888, 0.263, respectively).
Conclusions
Colorectal cancer patients with tumor location had different clinicopathologic features. Patients with rectal cancer had better five-year survival rate than those with left located and right located colon cancer. Tumor location had different effects on the prognosis according to the different TNM stage-subgroups.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.