Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2026
Spinal root magnetic stimulation: evaluating the limitations of a less invasive method to assess voluntary activation of the respiratory muscles.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Prajnadewie Chiettha, Luu Billy L, Finn Harrison T, Mathew Anandit J, Gandevia Simon C, Hudson Anna L, Butler Jane E
Аннотация
Spinal root magnetic stimulation can be used to assess diaphragm voluntary activation (VA), but its validity during inspiratory efforts remains unclear. In addition, its use to evaluate abdominal muscle VA during expiratory efforts has not been explored. This study investigates spinal root magnetic stimulation as a method to assess VA of inspiratory and expiratory muscles. In 13 healthy participants (8 female, 18-40 yr), magnetic stimulation was delivered over the cervical spine (C6) and lower thoracic spine (T10) to activate the diaphragm (n = 11) during inspiratory efforts and the abdominal muscles (n = 11) during expiratory efforts, respectively. A nasogastric catheter recorded inspiratory transdiaphragmatic and expiratory gastric pressures. During voluntary 25/50/75/100% maximal inspiratory and expiratory efforts, stimuli were delivered at 100% stimulator output to produce a superimposed twitch and, ∼5 s later, a resting twitch, to calculate VA. Good utility of the technique was assessed per individual as r2 ≥ 0.7 and 95% prediction interval (95% PI) limits within 25% of the predicted VA. For inspiratory muscles, VA had poor correspondence and predictability (r2 = 0.26-0.85; 95% PI limits: 27.1%-74.5%) with contraction intensity in 8/11 participants and good correspondence and predictability (r2 = 0.83-0.90; 95% PI limits: 22.7%-23.8%) in 3/11 participants. For expiratory muscles, VA had good correspondence and predictability (r2 = 0.73-0.97; 95% PI limits: 10.4%-20.8%) with contraction intensity in 7/11 participants and poor correspondence and predictability (r2 = 0.13-0.72; 95% PI limits: 19.0%-40.0%) in 4/11 participants. Spinal root magnetic stimulation can be used with caveats to assess expiratory muscle VA only, requiring individualized testing across multiple contraction intensities and a comparison of estimated versus measured resting twitches.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Magnetic stimulation of the cervical spinal roots cannot be used to assess voluntary activation of the diaphragm reliably during inspiratory efforts. However, magnetic stimulation of the thoracic spinal roots could be used to assess abdominal muscle voluntary activation during expiratory efforts but, importantly, required estimation of the twitch response at rest. This novel, less invasive method may be used to assess expiratory muscle activation, but requires testing across a range of contraction intensities.