MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jncc.2026.01.004

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2026

Efficacy and safety comparisons of PD-1 versus PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with solid cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yu Jun, Zhou Qiaoxia, Wang Guoqiang, Shi Shangheng, Wang Hongwei, Yang Jinyu, Sun Xiaoran, Li Junjun, Shi Yezhen, Wang Jing, Guo Xiaofan, Zou Yiping, Xie Yongjie, Zhang Zhou, Zhang Yuzi, Cai Shangli, Hao Jihui

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

A comprehensive evaluation between PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors is critical for appropriate treatment choice. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors, this meta-analysis was conducted through adjusted indirect comparison.

METHODS

Systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases from January 1st 2000 to January 31st 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with standard treatments in solid tumors were retrieved. Eligible RCTs regarding PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors were matched as mirror groups according to the same population and study design. Hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease-free/event-free survival (DFS/EFS), and risk ratio (RR) for objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AEs) were generated from indirect comparisons in each mirror group and pooled for overall meta-analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 96 eligible RCTs with 104 arms of 56,597 patients were identified to construct 32 mirror groups. Patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors exhibited improved OS (HR, 0.86 [95% CI: 0.81, 0.90]; P < 0.001), PFS (HR, 0.85 [95% CI: 0.75, 0.96]; P = 0.01), and DFS/EFS (HR, 0.81 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.94]; P = 0.005) in all populations compared with those with PD-L1 inhibitors, together with a higher ORR (RR, 1.12 [95% CI: 1.04, 1.20]; P = 0.002). While PD-1 inhibitors showed comparable rates of treatment-related AEs with PD-L1 inhibitors, PD-1 inhibitors demonstrated a higher discontinuation rate due to treatment-related AEs (RR, 2.27 [95% CI: 1.91, 2.70]; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis revealed that PD-1 inhibitors exhibited better survival outcomes compared with PD-L1 inhibitors in solid tumors with comparable safety profiles except for a higher discontinuation rate. This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO as CRD42023452639.

Для цитирования: Yu Jun, Zhou Qiaoxia, Wang Guoqiang, Shi Shangheng, Wang Hongwei, Yang Jinyu, Sun Xiaoran, Li Junjun, Shi Yezhen, Wang Jing, Guo Xiaofan, Zou Yiping, Xie Yongjie, Zhang Zhou, Zhang Yuzi, Cai Shangli, Hao Jihui. Efficacy and safety comparisons of PD-1 versus PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with solid cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. Journal of the National Cancer Center. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2026.01.004.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.