DOI 10.1016/j.cmpb.2025.108728
Efficient annotation bootstrapping for cell identification in follicular lymphoma.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE
In the medical field of digital pathology, many tasks rely on visual assessments of tissue patterns or cells, presenting an opportunity to apply computer vision methods. However, acquiring a substantial number of annotations for developing deep learning algorithms remains a bottleneck. The annotation process is inherently biased due to various constraints, including labor shortages, high costs, time inefficiencies, and a strongly imbalanced distribution of labels. This study explores available solutions for reducing the costs of annotation bootstrapping in the challenging task of follicular lymphoma diagnosis.
METHODS
We compare three distinct approaches to annotation bootstrapping: extensive manual annotations, active learning, and weak supervision. We propose a hybrid architecture for centroblast and centrocyte detection from whole slide images, based on a custom cell encoder and contextual encoding derived from foundation models for digital pathology. We collected a dataset of 41 whole slide images scanned with a 20x objective lens and resolution 0.24μm/pixel, from which 12,704 cell annotations were gathered.
RESULTS
Applying our proposed active learning workflow led to an almost twofold increase in the number of samples within the minority class. The best bootstrapping method improved the overall performance of the detection algorithm by 18 percentage points, yielding a macro-averaged F1-score, precision, and recall of 63%.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of this study may find applications in other digital pathology problems, particularly for tasks involving a lack of homogeneous cell clusters within whole slide images.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.