Urology · 2023
Pelvic Ectopic Kidney Prevalence and Pressure Changes During Cloacal Exstrophy (Omphalocele-Exstrophy-Imperforate Anus-Spinal Defects Syndrome) Closure.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lee Ted, Roth Elizabeth, Shukla Aseem, Gupta Naveen, Lee Richard, Kryger John, Groth Travis, Canning Douglas, Mitchell Michael, Weiss Dana, Borer Joseph
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence of pelvic ectopic kidneys (PEK) and compare renal parameters of the PEK to the orthotopic kidney following pubic bone approximation.
METHODS: In four Omphalocele-Exstrophy-Imperforate Anus-Spinal Defects Syndrome (OEIS) patients undergoing second-stage repair with known pelvic and orthotopic kidneys, changes in the renal pelvis pressure (RPP), peak systolic velocity (PSV), and resistive index (RI) were measured in the pelvic and orthotopic kidneys following pubic bone approximation. A paired t-test was performed for analysis. Prevalence was tabulated using a multi-institutional retrospective review.
RESULTS: Mean rise in RPP was +26.0 mmHg in the PEK and +10.3 mmHg in the orthotopic kidney (P = .55). One patient had immediate increase in RPP of 66 mmHg in the PEK (7 mmHg in the orthotopic kidney) which decreased to +17 mmHg in the PEK upon release of the pubic approximation stitch. Mean change in PSV was +67.7 cm/s in the PEK compared to - 25.7 cm/s in the orthotopic kidney (P = .09). Mean change in renal RI was + 0.06 in PEK compared to - 0.01 in the orthotopic kidney (P = .29). Among 80 OEIS patients, 24 (30%) had a PEK. 3 (4%) had a solitary PEK.
CONCLUSION: During second-stage OEIS closure, we witnessed patterns of higher change in RPP, PSV, and RI of the PEK compared to the orthotopic kidney. Furthermore, PEKs were found in nearly a third of our OEIS patients. Real-time RPP monitoring, especially those with solitary PEK, may aid in the management of OEIS patients during the perioperative period.
METHODS: In four Omphalocele-Exstrophy-Imperforate Anus-Spinal Defects Syndrome (OEIS) patients undergoing second-stage repair with known pelvic and orthotopic kidneys, changes in the renal pelvis pressure (RPP), peak systolic velocity (PSV), and resistive index (RI) were measured in the pelvic and orthotopic kidneys following pubic bone approximation. A paired t-test was performed for analysis. Prevalence was tabulated using a multi-institutional retrospective review.
RESULTS: Mean rise in RPP was +26.0 mmHg in the PEK and +10.3 mmHg in the orthotopic kidney (P = .55). One patient had immediate increase in RPP of 66 mmHg in the PEK (7 mmHg in the orthotopic kidney) which decreased to +17 mmHg in the PEK upon release of the pubic approximation stitch. Mean change in PSV was +67.7 cm/s in the PEK compared to - 25.7 cm/s in the orthotopic kidney (P = .09). Mean change in renal RI was + 0.06 in PEK compared to - 0.01 in the orthotopic kidney (P = .29). Among 80 OEIS patients, 24 (30%) had a PEK. 3 (4%) had a solitary PEK.
CONCLUSION: During second-stage OEIS closure, we witnessed patterns of higher change in RPP, PSV, and RI of the PEK compared to the orthotopic kidney. Furthermore, PEKs were found in nearly a third of our OEIS patients. Real-time RPP monitoring, especially those with solitary PEK, may aid in the management of OEIS patients during the perioperative period.