MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/lsm.70035

Медицинская библиотека · Lasers in surgery and medicine · 2025

Consensus Statement on the Prevention and Management of Complications of Fully Ablative Laser Resurfacing of the Face.

Kang Bianca Y, Cohen Joel L, Geronemus Roy, Kilmer Suzanne L, Ross Edward Victor, Tanzi Elizabeth L, Waibel Jill S, Wong Brian J F, Alam Murad, Alexiades Macrene, Arndt Kenneth A, Avram Mathew, Bhatia Ashish C, Biesman Brian Stuart, Bloom Jason D, Burns A Jay, Chan Henry H L, DiGiorgio Catherine M, Dover Jeffrey S, Fathizadeh Sam, Esteves Sara C, Gold Michael H, Goldberg Gerald N, Haedersdal Merete, Hoss Elika, Ibrahimi Omar A, Jalian H Ray, Kelly Kristen M, Manuskiatti Woraphong, Marks Lisa A, Munavalli Girish S, Pozner Jason N, Robb Chris W, Rossi Anthony M, Saedi Nazanin, Shumaker Peter R, Stankiewicz Kelly, Wanner Molly, Wu Douglas C, Wulkan Adam J, Ortiz Arisa

СтатьяConsensus StatementПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To achieve consensus among expert laser surgeons on standards for the prevention and management of adverse events from fully ablative laser resurfacing of the face.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Delphi study with two rounds of ratings and revisions until consensus was achieved. The draft set of statements was developed by a steering committee based on expert clinical experience. This was followed by two rounds of rating and revisions completed by an expert panel, then a virtual consensus meeting. In both rounds, respondents rated the draft statements on a 9-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree; 9 = strongly agree) and optionally provided comments. The consensus meeting was supplemented by the results of a systematic review of the literature (from 2000 to 2023).

RESULTS

Two rounds of Delphi survey were completed by 34 participants across four countries. Represented specialties were dermatology, facial plastic surgery, plastic surgery, and oculoplastic surgery. The initial 105 statements from round 1 expanded to 112 in round 2, with 96 statements achieving consensus. These included possible adverse events (11 statements); absolute and relative contraindications to treatment (5 statements); preoperative care and antimicrobial prophylaxis precautions (16 statements); intraoperative precautions (17 statements); postoperative care (21 statements); monitoring for and management of infection (16 statements); management of pigmentation changes (6 statements); and management of scarring and incipient scarring (4 statements).

CONCLUSION

An international consensus statement was developed for the prevention and management of complications associated with fully ablative laser resurfacing of the face. While expert practices vary, key factors for optimizing outcomes include careful patient selection, counseling, and meticulous pre- and postoperative care. Further research will improve our understanding of this treatment technique.

Для цитирования: Kang Bianca Y, Cohen Joel L, Geronemus Roy, Kilmer Suzanne L, Ross Edward Victor, Tanzi Elizabeth L, Waibel Jill S, Wong Brian J F, Alam Murad, Alexiades Macrene, Arndt Kenneth A, Avram Mathew, Bhatia Ashish C, Biesman Brian Stuart, Bloom Jason D, Burns A Jay, Chan Henry H L, DiGiorgio Catherine M, Dover Jeffrey S, Fathizadeh Sam, Esteves Sara C, Gold Michael H, Goldberg Gerald N, Haedersdal Merete, Hoss Elika, Ibrahimi Omar A, Jalian H Ray, Kelly Kristen M, Manuskiatti Woraphong, Marks Lisa A, Munavalli Girish S, Pozner Jason N, Robb Chris W, Rossi Anthony M, Saedi Nazanin, Shumaker Peter R, Stankiewicz Kelly, Wanner Molly, Wu Douglas C, Wulkan Adam J, Ortiz Arisa. Consensus Statement on the Prevention and Management of Complications of Fully Ablative Laser Resurfacing of the Face.. Lasers in surgery and medicine. 2025. DOI: 10.1002/lsm.70035.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.