DOI 10.1016/j.ijcrp.2026.200697
Real-world patterns in lipid profile testing and lipid-lowering therapy in hospitalized patients: The Jurasz Lipid Study.
Аннотация
AIMS: The aim of the Jurasz Lipid Study was to provide real-world evidence on lipid profile testing, as well as the prevalence of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) in consecutive patients hospitalized in a tertiary multi-specialist hospital in Poland.
METHODS AND
RESULTS
A total of 40,646 patients were hospitalized across all analyzed departments. The majority of patients hospitalized in the cardiology and neurology departments underwent lipid profile evaluation (93.6% and 95.0%, respectively), while it was rarely performed in surgical department (14.9%). Patients receiving LLT, compared with untreated patients, more frequently had a history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and lipid profile testing. The prevalence of LLT use ranged from 0.1% in pediatrics to 35.1% in vascular surgery, 37.1% in neurology, up to 65.7% in cardiology and 69.1% in the cardiac surgery department. Statin monotherapy remained the standard of care, with atorvastatin and rosuvastatin being the most frequently used agents. The proportion of patients receiving high-intensity statin therapy ranged from 29.2% in neurology to 71.7% among ASCVD patients in cardiology. The combination of a statin with ezetimibe was used in up to 36.1% of ASCVD patients hospitalized in cardiology. Other LLT combinations were rarely observed.
CONCLUSION
Lipid profile evaluation was routinely performed by cardiologists and neurologists, but rarely ordered by surgeons. The majority of patients with ASCVD were treated with LLT, but only up to 29.4% achieve treatment goals. Statin monotherapy remained the cornerstone of LLT. Statin with ezetimibe was the most common therapeutic combination.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.