MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.06.163

Медицинская библиотека · World neurosurgery · 2019

Brain Metastasis of Pheochromocytoma: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenge.

Kammoun Brahim, Belmabrouk Houda, Kolsi Fatma, Kammoun Omar, Kallel Rim, Ammar Mouna, Kallel Mouna, Mseddi Mohamed Amine, Boudawara Mohamed Zaher

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Pheochromocytoma brain metastasis is extremely rare. Few cases have been reported in the literature. Therefore, diagnosis and effective treatment of these lesions are difficult.

CASE DESCRIPTION: Here, we report the case of 29-year-old woman, who was operated on for a right adrenal pheochromocytoma. Fourteen months later, a posterior fossa tumor was diagnosed. Radiologic findings mimicked an extra-axial lesion. The radiologic differential diagnosis was difficult even using magnetic resonance imaging spectroscopy. The patient was operated on through a retrosigmoid approach. Local recurrence occurred 6 months after first surgery. The patient died 1 month later, despite a second operation.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the occurrence of brain metastases in pheochromocytoma is not prevalent, patients presenting with suggestive features need to be carefully considered. Magnetic resonance imaging can help in differential diagnosis with a primary brain tumor. There are no established guidelines for the treatment of pheochromocytoma brain metastasis, for which the prognosis remains dismal, despite effective surgery.

Для цитирования: Kammoun Brahim, Belmabrouk Houda, Kolsi Fatma, Kammoun Omar, Kallel Rim, Ammar Mouna, Kallel Mouna, Mseddi Mohamed Amine, Boudawara Mohamed Zaher. Brain Metastasis of Pheochromocytoma: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenge.. World neurosurgery. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.06.163.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.