Japanese journal of radiology · 2010
Comparison of sclerosing cholangitis with autoimmune pancreatitis and infiltrative extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: multidetector-row computed tomography findings.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Arikawa Shunji, Uchida Masafumi, Kunou Yukiko, Uozumi Jun, Abe Toshi, Hayabuchi Naofumi, Ishida Yusuke, Kaji Ryohei, Okabe Yoshinobu, Murotani Kenta
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) findings between cases of sclerosing cholangitis with autoimmune pancreatitis (SC-AIP) and infiltrative extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IEC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively assessed MDCT findings from 16 IEC cases and 13 SC-AIP cases. MDCT findings were analyzed with regard to location, length, wall thickness, contour, stricture wall enhancement pattern, proximal duct diameter, and the presence of diffuse concentric thickening in the proximal duct and gallbladder wall thickness.
RESULTS: Stricture length, stricture wall thickness, and proximal duct diameter were significantly smaller for SC-AIP than for IEC: 19.3 +/- 8.7 vs. 31.8 +/- 12.0 mm (P = 0.004), 2.1 +/- 1.3 vs. 4.1 +/- 1.3 mm (P < 0.001), and 9.2 +/- 3.9 vs. 13.3 +/- 5.0 mm (P = 0.012), respectively. SC-AIP was correlated with stricture location in both the intrapancreatic and hilar hepatic bile ducts, concentric stricture contour (P < 0.001), and diffuse concentric thickening of the proximal bile duct (P = 0.010). Overall values of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy used to distinguish between SC-AIP and IEC for stricture wall thickness of <3.0 mm and concentric contour were 76.9%, 93.8%, and 86.2%, respectively, and 100%, 87.5%, 93.1%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Concentric contour and stricture wall thicknesses of <3.0 mm may help distinguish between SC-AIP and IEC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively assessed MDCT findings from 16 IEC cases and 13 SC-AIP cases. MDCT findings were analyzed with regard to location, length, wall thickness, contour, stricture wall enhancement pattern, proximal duct diameter, and the presence of diffuse concentric thickening in the proximal duct and gallbladder wall thickness.
RESULTS: Stricture length, stricture wall thickness, and proximal duct diameter were significantly smaller for SC-AIP than for IEC: 19.3 +/- 8.7 vs. 31.8 +/- 12.0 mm (P = 0.004), 2.1 +/- 1.3 vs. 4.1 +/- 1.3 mm (P < 0.001), and 9.2 +/- 3.9 vs. 13.3 +/- 5.0 mm (P = 0.012), respectively. SC-AIP was correlated with stricture location in both the intrapancreatic and hilar hepatic bile ducts, concentric stricture contour (P < 0.001), and diffuse concentric thickening of the proximal bile duct (P = 0.010). Overall values of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy used to distinguish between SC-AIP and IEC for stricture wall thickness of <3.0 mm and concentric contour were 76.9%, 93.8%, and 86.2%, respectively, and 100%, 87.5%, 93.1%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Concentric contour and stricture wall thicknesses of <3.0 mm may help distinguish between SC-AIP and IEC.