Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
Balancing barriers: Family, career, and gender equality in radiation oncology and radiation research-An interdisciplinary prospective survey among the young workforce.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Trommer Maike, Grohmann Maximilian, Fabian Alexander, Ehret Felix, Hess Julia, Rückert Michael, Matschke Johann, Stefanowicz Sarah, Rühle Alexander, Ferdinandus Simone, Merten Ricarda, Besserer Angela, Schmidt Livia, Sperk Elena, Depardon Alina, Putz Florian, Petersen Cordula, Haderlein Marlen, Schröder Annemarie, Weissmann Thomas, Deloch Lisa
Аннотация
PURPOSE: There is an urgent need to recruit and retain young professionals in radiation oncology and radiation research as the healthcare system faces major challenges. Our study investigated the experiences and needs of young professionals in this field, focusing on the impact of unpaid care work and gender-related issues.
METHODS: A web-based survey was created and distributed over a six-week period, featuring one general questionnaire along with three occupation-specific versions tailored for physicians, biologists, and medical physicists involved in radiation oncology and research.
RESULTS: Most participants with care responsibilities have temporary contracts, especially female physicians and biologists, while female medical physicists are more likely to hold permanent positions. Research is often conducted outside regular hours, with limited cover arrangements and part-time options varying by field. Key career risks include economic pressure, work-life balance, and uncertain contracts, with employees with care duties feeling less supported overall. In addition, men seem to be more involved in care work and thus face unique challenges, such as insufficient career support and fears of poor future perspective. The study emphasizes the need for strategies to address relevant issues, such as flexible working arrangements, better mentoring support, and clear substitution policies that can ensure that young professionals can balance caring responsibilities with work and career demands.
CONCLUSION: Addressing these challenges is critical for sustaining a diverse and qualified workforce in radiation oncology and radiation research, ensuring excellence in patient care and scientific progress.
METHODS: A web-based survey was created and distributed over a six-week period, featuring one general questionnaire along with three occupation-specific versions tailored for physicians, biologists, and medical physicists involved in radiation oncology and research.
RESULTS: Most participants with care responsibilities have temporary contracts, especially female physicians and biologists, while female medical physicists are more likely to hold permanent positions. Research is often conducted outside regular hours, with limited cover arrangements and part-time options varying by field. Key career risks include economic pressure, work-life balance, and uncertain contracts, with employees with care duties feeling less supported overall. In addition, men seem to be more involved in care work and thus face unique challenges, such as insufficient career support and fears of poor future perspective. The study emphasizes the need for strategies to address relevant issues, such as flexible working arrangements, better mentoring support, and clear substitution policies that can ensure that young professionals can balance caring responsibilities with work and career demands.
CONCLUSION: Addressing these challenges is critical for sustaining a diverse and qualified workforce in radiation oncology and radiation research, ensuring excellence in patient care and scientific progress.