DOI 10.1007/s13760-023-02249-3
Leukoaraiosis severity is related to increased risk of early neurological deterioration in acute ischemic stroke: a retrospective observational study.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
The relationship between leukoaraiosis and early neurological deterioration in acute cerebral infarction patients remains controversial. We tried to determine whether an association existed between leukoaraiosis and early neurological deterioration in patients with acute ischemic stroke.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
We retrospectively enrolled acute cerebral infarction patients admitted to our our department within 4.5-72.0 h of symptom onset between January 2016 and March 2022. On the basis of the van Swieten scale, leukoaraiosis was evaluated as supratentorial white matter hypoattenuation on admission head CT and graded as 0 (absent), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate) and 3-4 (severe). Early neurological deterioration was defined as an increase in the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score by > = 2 points in the total score, or > = 1 point in motor power within the first seven days after admission.
RESULTS
Among 736 patients, 522 (70.9%) patients had leukoaraiosis, and of these, 332 (63.6%) had mild leukoaraiosis, 41 (7.9%) had moderate leukoaraiosis, and 149 (28.5%) had severe leukoaraiosis. 118 (16.0%) patients experienced early neurological deterioration: 20 of the 214 (9.5%) patients without leukoaraiosis and 98 of the 522 (18.8%) patients with leukoaraiosis. In multiple regression analysis, we found van Swieten scale predicted early neurological deterioration independently (OR = 1.570; 95% CI: 1.226-2.012).
CONCLUSIONS
Leukoaraiosis is common in acute cerebral infarction patients and leukoaraiosis severity is related to increased risk of early neurological deterioration in the patients.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.